A comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
MetadataShow full item record
BACKGROUND:Evidence has been systematically assessed comparing robotic with standard laparoscopy for treatment of endometrial cancer. METHODS:A search of Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed until 30th October 2016. RESULTS:Thirty-six papers including 33 retrospective studies, two matched case-control studies and one randomized controlled study were used in a meta-analysis. Information from a further seven registry/database studies were assessed descriptively. There were no differences in the duration of surgery but days stay in hospital were shorter in the robotic arm (0.46 days, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.66). A robotic approach had less blood loss (57.74 mL, 95%CI 38.29 to 77.20), less conversions to laparotomy (RR = 0.41, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.59), and less overall complications (RR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.72 to 0.93). A robotic approach had higher costs ($1746.20, 95%CI $63.37 to $3429.03). CONCLUSION:A robotic approach has favourable clinical outcomes but is more expensive.
Version of record
Health Care Costs
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Robotic Surgical Procedures
License start date
The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS, 2017, 13 (4)