Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorInd, T
dc.contributor.authorLaios, A
dc.contributor.authorHacking, M
dc.contributor.authorNobbenhuis, M
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-14T15:10:40Z
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.identifier.citationThe international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS, 2017, 13 (4)
dc.identifier.issn1478-5951
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/1086
dc.identifier.eissn1478-596X
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/rcs.1851
dc.description.abstractBackground Evidence has been systematically assessed comparing robotic with standard laparoscopy for treatment of endometrial cancer.Methods A search of Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed until 30th October 2016.Results Thirty-six papers including 33 retrospective studies, two matched case-control studies and one randomized controlled study were used in a meta-analysis. Information from a further seven registry/database studies were assessed descriptively. There were no differences in the duration of surgery but days stay in hospital were shorter in the robotic arm (0.46 days, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.66). A robotic approach had less blood loss (57.74 mL, 95%CI 38.29 to 77.20), less conversions to laparotomy (RR = 0.41, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.59), and less overall complications (RR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.72 to 0.93). A robotic approach had higher costs ($1746.20, 95%CI $63.37 to $3429.03).Conclusion A robotic approach has favourable clinical outcomes but is more expensive.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectEndometrial Neoplasms
dc.subjectLaparoscopy
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectLaparotomy
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectRobotics
dc.subjectHealth Care Costs
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subjectRobotic Surgical Procedures
dc.titleA comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-06-09
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1002/rcs.1851
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-12
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfThe international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS
pubs.issue4
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume13
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
dc.contributor.icrauthorMarsden,en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0