dc.contributor.author | Ind, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Laios, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Hacking, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Nobbenhuis, M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-14T15:10:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS, 2017, 13 (4) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1478-5951 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/1086 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1478-596X | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/rcs.1851 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background Evidence has been systematically assessed comparing robotic with standard laparoscopy for treatment of endometrial cancer.Methods A search of Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed until 30th October 2016.Results Thirty-six papers including 33 retrospective studies, two matched case-control studies and one randomized controlled study were used in a meta-analysis. Information from a further seven registry/database studies were assessed descriptively. There were no differences in the duration of surgery but days stay in hospital were shorter in the robotic arm (0.46 days, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.66). A robotic approach had less blood loss (57.74 mL, 95%CI 38.29 to 77.20), less conversions to laparotomy (RR = 0.41, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.59), and less overall complications (RR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.72 to 0.93). A robotic approach had higher costs ($1746.20, 95%CI $63.37 to $3429.03).Conclusion A robotic approach has favourable clinical outcomes but is more expensive. | |
dc.format | Print-Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Endometrial Neoplasms | |
dc.subject | Laparoscopy | |
dc.subject | Treatment Outcome | |
dc.subject | Laparotomy | |
dc.subject | Retrospective Studies | |
dc.subject | Robotics | |
dc.subject | Health Care Costs | |
dc.subject | Female | |
dc.subject | Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic | |
dc.subject | Robotic Surgical Procedures | |
dc.title | A comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2017-06-09 | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1002/rcs.1851 | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2017-12 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
dc.relation.isPartOf | The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS | |
pubs.issue | 4 | |
pubs.notes | Not known | |
pubs.organisational-group | /ICR | |
pubs.organisational-group | /ICR/Primary Group | |
pubs.organisational-group | /ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units | |
pubs.organisational-group | /ICR | |
pubs.organisational-group | /ICR/Primary Group | |
pubs.organisational-group | /ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 13 | |
pubs.embargo.terms | Not known | |
dc.contributor.icrauthor | Marsden, | en |