Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVerma, S
dc.contributor.authorBartlett, CH
dc.contributor.authorSchnell, P
dc.contributor.authorDeMichele, AM
dc.contributor.authorLoi, S
dc.contributor.authorRo, J
dc.contributor.authorColleoni, M
dc.contributor.authorIwata, H
dc.contributor.authorHarbeck, N
dc.contributor.authorCristofanilli, M
dc.contributor.authorZhang, K
dc.contributor.authorThiele, A
dc.contributor.authorTurner, NC
dc.contributor.authorRugo, HS
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-28T11:10:01Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-01
dc.identifier.citationThe oncologist, 2016, 21 (10), pp. 1165 - 1175
dc.identifier.issn1083-7159
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/129
dc.identifier.eissn1549-490X
dc.identifier.doi10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0097
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Palbociclib enhances endocrine therapy and improves clinical outcomes in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Because this is a new target, it is clinically important to understand palbociclib's safety profile to effectively manage toxicity and optimize clinical benefit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with endocrine-resistant, HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC (n = 521) were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscular injection) with or without goserelin with oral palbociclib (125 mg daily; 3 weeks on/1 week off) or placebo. Safety assessments at baseline and day 1 of each cycle included blood counts on day 15 for the first 2 cycles. Hematologic toxicity was assessed by using laboratory data. RESULTS: A total of 517 patients were treated (palbociclib, n = 345; placebo, n = 172); median follow-up was 8.9 months. With palbociclib, neutropenia was the most common grade 3 (55%) and 4 (10%) adverse event; median times to onset and duration of grade ≥3 episodes were 16 and 7 days, respectively. Asian ethnicity and below-median neutrophil counts at baseline were significantly associated with an increased chance of developing grade 3-4 neutropenia with palbociclib. Dose modifications for grade 3-4 neutropenia had no adverse effect on progression-free survival. In the palbociclib arm, febrile neutropenia occurred in 3 (<1%) patients. The percentage of grade 1-2 infections was higher than in the placebo arm. Grade 1 stomatitis occurred in 8% of patients. CONCLUSION: Palbociclib plus fulvestrant treatment was well-tolerated, and the primary toxicity of asymptomatic neutropenia was effectively managed by dose modification without apparent loss of efficacy. This study appears at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01942135. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Treatment with palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant was generally safe and well-tolerated in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer. Consistent with the drug's proposed mechanism of action, palbociclib-related neutropenia differs in its clinical time course, patterns, and consequences from those seen with chemotherapy. Neutropenia can be effectively managed by a dose reduction, interruption, or cycle delay without compromising efficacy. A significant efficacy gain and a favorable safety profile support the consideration of incorporating palbociclib into the routine management of HR-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent1165 - 1175
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectNeoplasm Metastasis
dc.subjectPiperazines
dc.subjectPyridines
dc.subjectEstradiol
dc.subjectReceptor, erbB-2
dc.subjectReceptors, Estrogen
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subjectDouble-Blind Method
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFulvestrant
dc.titlePalbociclib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer: Detailed Safety Analysis From a Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study (PALOMA-3).
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-05-10
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0097
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-10
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfThe oncologist
pubs.issue10
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research/Molecular Oncology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research/Molecular Oncology
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume21
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamMolecular Oncology
dc.contributor.icrauthorTurner, Nicholas


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record