Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland.
St John, ER
MetadataShow full item record
INTRODUCTION: There is variation in margin policy for breast conserving therapy (BCT) in the UK and Ireland. In response to the Society of Surgical Oncology and American Society for Radiation Oncology (SSO-ASTRO) margin consensus ('no ink on tumour' for invasive and 2 mm for ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]) and the Association of Breast Surgery (ABS) consensus (1 mm for invasive and DCIS), we report on current margin practice and unit infrastructure in the UK and Ireland and describe how these factors impact on re-excision rates. METHODS: A trainee collaborative-led multicentre prospective study was conducted in the UK and Ireland between 1st February and 31st May 2016. Data were collected on consecutive BCT patients and on local infrastructure and policies. RESULTS: A total of 79 sites participated in the data collection (75% screening units; average 372 cancers annually, range 70-900). For DCIS, 53.2% of units accept 1 mm and 38% accept 2-mm margins. For invasive disease 77.2% accept 1 mm and 13.9% accept 'no ink on tumour'. A total of 2858 patients underwent BCT with a mean re-excision rate of 17.2% across units (range 0-41%). The re-excision rate would be reduced to 15% if all units applied SSO-ASTRO guidelines and to 14.8% if all units followed ABS guidelines. Of those who required re-operation, 65% had disease present at margin. CONCLUSION: There continues to be large variation in margin policy and re-excision rates across units. Altering margin policies to follow either SSO-ASTRO or ABS guidelines would result in a modest reduction in the national re-excision rate. Most re-excisions are for involved margins rather than close margins.
Version of record
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
Margins of Excision
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Quality Indicators, Health Care
License start date
Eur J Cancer, 84 pp. 315 - 324
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
LAUNCH OF THE BREAST SCREENING AFTER RADIOTHERAPY DATASET - AN ENGLAND WIDE INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE SCREENING FOR BREAST CANCER IN 9,000 WOMEN AT HIGH RISK FOLLOWING RADIOTHERAPY TO BREAST TISSUE UNDER AGE 36 Radford, J; Howell, S; Vaughan, K; Goode, V; Worthington, D; Yates-Bolton, N; Payne, E; Jenkins, J; Sibbering, M; Swerdlow, A; Cowan, R (2016-10)
Do Patient-reported Outcome Measures Agree with Clinical and Photographic Assessments of Normal Tissue Effects after Breast Radiotherapy? The Experience of the Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trials in Early Breast Cancer. Haviland, JS; Hopwood, P; Mills, J; Sydenham, M; Bliss, JM; Yarnold, JR (2016-06)In radiotherapy trials, normal tissue effects (NTE) are important end points and it is pertinent to ask whether patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) could replace clinical and/or photographic assessments. Data from ...
Partial breast radiotherapy after breast conservation surgery for early breast cancer: 5-year outcomes from the IMPORT LOW (CRUK/06/003) phase III randomised controlled trial Coles, C; Griffin, C; Kirby, A; Titley, J; Agrawal, R; Alhasso, A; Bhattacharya, I; Brunt, M; Ciurlionis, L; Chan, C; Donovan, E; Emson, M; Harnett, A; Haviland, J; Hopwood, P; Jefford, M; Kaggwa, R; Sawyer, E; Syndikus, I; Tsang, Y; Wheatley, D; Wilcox, M; Yarnold, J; Bliss, J