Significant differences in biological parameters between prodrugs cleavable by carboxypeptidase G2 that generate 3,5-difluoro-phenol and -aniline nitrogen mustards in gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy systems.
Date
2004-05-06Author
Niculescu-Duvaz, I
Scanlon, I
Niculescu-Duvaz, D
Friedlos, F
Martin, J
Marais, R
Springer, CJ
Type
Journal Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Nine new nitrogen mustard compounds derived from 2,6-difluoro-4-hydroxy- (3a-e) and 2,6-difluoro-4-amino- (4a-d) aniline were synthesized as potential prodrugs. They were designed to be activated to their corresponding 3,5-difluorophenol and -aniline (4)-nitrogen mustards by the enzyme carboxypeptidase G2 (CPG2) in gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (GDEPT) models. The compounds were tested for cytotoxicity in the MDA MB-361 breast adenocarcinoma. The cell line was engineered to express stably either CPG2 tethered to the cell surface stCPG2-(Q)3 or beta-galactosidase (beta-Gal) as control. The cytotoxicity differentials were calculated between CPG 2-expressing and -nonexpressing cells and yielded different results for the two series of prodrugs despite their structural similarities. While the phenol compounds are ineffective as prodrugs, their aniline counterparts exhibit outstanding activity in the tumor cell lines expressing CPG2. [3,5-Difluoro-4-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]phenyl]carbamoyl-l-glutamic acid gave a differential of >227 in MDA MB361 cells as compared with 19 exhibited by 4-[(2-chloroethyl)(2-mesyloxyethyl)amino]benzoyl-l-glutamic acid, 1a, which has been in clinical trials.
Collections
Subject
Cell Line, Tumor
Animals
Humans
Mice
Benzene Derivatives
Nitrogen Mustard Compounds
Aniline Mustard
gamma-Glutamyl Hydrolase
Glutamic Acid
Antineoplastic Agents
Prodrugs
Transplantation, Heterologous
Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor
Neoplasm Transplantation
Structure-Activity Relationship
Half-Life
Female
Genetic Therapy
Research team
Gene & Oncogene Targeting
Signal Transduction
Language
eng
License start date
2004-05
Citation
Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2004, 47 (10), pp. 2651 - 2658
Publisher
AMER CHEMICAL SOC