Publications Repository

Publications Repository

View item 
  •   Home
  • ICR Divisions
  • Closed Research Teams
  • View item
  • Home
  • ICR Divisions
  • Closed Research Teams
  • View item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

False-positive screening results in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer

Thumbnail
Date
2011-12
ICR Author
Moss, Susan Mary
Author
Kilpelainen, TP
Tammela, TLJ
Roobol, M
Hugosson, J
Ciatto, S
Nelen, V
Moss, S
Maattanen, L
Auvinen, A
Show allShow less
Type
Journal Article
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Background: Screening for prostate cancer (PC) with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been shown to decrease mortality, but has adverse effects, such as false-positive (FP) screening results. We describe the frequency of FP results and assess their relation to subsequent screening attendance, test results and prostate cancer risk in a large randomized trial. Materials and methods: We included data from five centres of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, altogether over 61,000 screened men. Men were screened with PSA test at a 2-7 year interval depending on the centre; PSA cut-off was 3.0-4.0 ng/ml. A positive screen with no histologically confirmed PC in biopsy within 1 year was defined as an FP result. Results: Of the 61,604 men who were screened at least once, 17.8% had one or more FP result(s). Almost 20% of men who participated at all screening rounds had one or more FP result(s). More than half of the men with an FP result had another FP if screened again. Men with FP results had a fourfold risk of PC at subsequent screen (depending on the round, 10.0% versus 2.6-2.7% of men with negative screen, risk ratio 3.8-3.9). The PCs following an FP result were in 92.8% of cases localised and low-grade versus 90.4% following a screen-negative result. Conclusions: Our results show that FP results are common adverse effects in PC screening, as they affect at least one in six screened men. False-positive men are more prone to be diagnosed with PC but are also likely to have consistently high PSA levels. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
URI
https://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.055
Collections
  • Closed Research Teams
Research team
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit (DoH)
Language
eng
License start date
2011-12
Citation
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 pp. 2698 - 2705
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD

Browse

All of ICR repositoryICR DivisionsBy issue dateAuthorsTitlesPublication TypesThis collectionBy issue dateAuthorsTitlesPublication Types
  • Login
  • Registered office: The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP
    A Charity, Not for Profit. Company Limited by Guarantee.
    Registered in England No. 534147. VAT Registration No. GB 849 0581 02.