Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSah, SPen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatutes, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorWotherspoon, ACen_US
dc.contributor.authorMorilla, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorCatovsky, Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-17T15:17:58Z
dc.date.issued2003-02en_US
dc.identifier2en_US
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2003, 56 pp. 129 - 132en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-9746en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/2747
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/jcp.56.2.129en_US
dc.description.abstractAims: To evaluate the diagnostic value of bone marrow aspirates, trephine biopsies (BMB), and flow cytometry (FC) in the assessment of bone marrow infiltration in chronic lymphoid disorders. Methods: Investigations were carried out in I 10 diagnostic and follow up specimens from B cell disorders, namely: chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL; 65), non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL; 39), and hairy cell leukaemia (HCL; 6). A selected panel of monoclonal antibodies was used both for FC and immunohistochemistry. Results: In CLL there was agreement between the three investigations in 71% of samples and in 88% when only FC and BMB were compared. In nine of 65 samples, FC and BMB were positive, although the aspirate was reported as negative. Four BMB negative samples had minimal residual disease (MRD) detected by FC, whereas two samples were positive both on BMB and aspirate but showed no evidence of disease on FC. In NHL, there was agreement between the three investigations in 22 of 39 cases, and in 27 of 39 cases there was agreement between FC and BMB. In eight of 39 NHL cases, FC was negative but the BMB was either positive (five) or uncertain (three), whereas in three of 39, FC was positive but BMB was either negative (one) or uncertain (two). In three of five uncertain BMB, no clonal population was detected by the polymerase chain reaction, whereas in the remaining two cases the nodular aggregates disappeared on further sectioning. Conclusions: Both BMB and FC are better than bone marrow aspirates for the detection of infiltration in B cell disorders. FC might be slightly more sensitive than BMB to detect MRD in CLL, whereas BMB may be slightly better than FC in NHL.en_US
dc.format.extent129 - 132en_US
dc.titleA comparison of flow cytometry, bone marrow biopsy, and bone marrow aspirates in the detection of lymphoid infiltration in B cell disordersen_US
dc.typeJournal Article
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/jcp.56.2.129en_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2003-02en_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGYen_US
pubs.notesunique-id: ISI:000180837400010en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Molecular Haematology (including Cytogenetics Group and Cell Markers)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Molecular Pathology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Molecular Pathology/Molecular Haematology (including Cytogenetics Group and Cell Markers)
pubs.volume56en_US
pubs.embargo.termsNot knownen_US
icr.researchteamMolecular Haematology (including Cytogenetics Group and Cell Markers)en_US
dc.contributor.icrauthorCatovsky, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.icrauthorMatutes, Estellaen_US
dc.contributor.icrauthorMorilla, Ricardoen_US
dc.contributor.icrauthorWotherspoon, Andrewen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record