Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFerreira, MR
dc.contributor.authorThomas, K
dc.contributor.authorTruelove, L
dc.contributor.authorKhan, A
dc.contributor.authorParker, C
dc.contributor.authorDearnaley, DP
dc.contributor.authorGulliford, S
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-10T09:57:23Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-01
dc.identifier.citationClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2019, 31 (6), pp. 374 - 384
dc.identifier.issn0936-6555
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/3174
dc.identifier.eissn1433-2981
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clon.2019.02.012
dc.description.abstractAIMS: Pelvic lymph node (PLN) radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer is limited by late gastrointestinal toxicity. Application of rectal and bowel constraints may reduce risks of side-effects. We evaluated associations between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) dose-volume data and long-term gastrointestinal toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from a single-centre dose-escalation trial of PLN-IMRT were analysed, including conventionally fractionated (CFRT) and hypofractionated (HFRT) radiotherapy schedules. Associations between volumes of rectum and bowel receiving specified doses and clinician- and patient-reported toxicity outcomes were investigated independently. A metric, δ median (δM), was defined as the difference in the medians of a volume between groups with and without toxicity at a specified dose and was used to test for statistically significant differences. RESULTS: Constraints were respected in most patients and, when exceeded, led to higher rates of gastrointestinal toxicity. Biologically relevant associations between rectum dose-points and toxicity were more numerous with both mild and moderate toxicity thresholds, but statistical significance was limited after correction for false discovery rate. Rectal V50Gy (CFRT) associated with grade 2+ bleeding; bowel V43Gy and V47 (HFRT/4 days/week schedule) associated with patient-reported loose stools and diarrhoea, respectively. Further investigation showed that CFRT patients with rectal bleeding had a mean rectal V50Gy above the treatment planning constraint. CONCLUSIONS: When dose-volume parameters are kept below tight constraints, toxicity is low. Residual dosimetry loses much of its predictive power for gastrointestinal toxicity in the setting of PLN-IMRT for prostate cancer. We have benchmarked dose-volume constraints for safely delivering PLN-IMRT using CFRT or HFRT.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent374 - 384
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectPelvis
dc.subjectIntestine, Large
dc.subjectRectum
dc.subjectLymph Nodes
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasms
dc.subjectLymphatic Metastasis
dc.subjectRadiometry
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
dc.titleDosimetry and Gastrointestinal Toxicity Relationships in a Phase II Trial of Pelvic Lymph Node Radiotherapy in Advanced Localised Prostate Cancer.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-02-04
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.clon.2019.02.012
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-06
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
pubs.issue6
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Closed research teams
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Closed research teams/Clinical Academic Radiotherapy (Dearnaley)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radiotherapy Physics Modelling
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Closed research teams
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Closed research teams/Clinical Academic Radiotherapy (Dearnaley)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radiotherapy Physics Modelling
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume31
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamClinical Academic Radiotherapy (Dearnaley)
icr.researchteamRadiotherapy Physics Modelling
dc.contributor.icrauthorDearnaley, David


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0