Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGiles, SL
dc.contributor.authorImseeh, G
dc.contributor.authorRivens, I
dc.contributor.authorTer Haar, GR
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, A
dc.contributor.authordeSouza, NM
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-16T15:21:59Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-16
dc.identifier.citationThe British journal of radiology, 2019, 92 (1098), pp. 20181037 - ?
dc.identifier.issn0007-1285
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/3230
dc.identifier.eissn1748-880X
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/bjr.20181037
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of targeting recurrent gynaecological tumours with MR guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU). METHODS: 20 patients with recurrent gynaecological tumours were prospectively scanned on a Philips/Profound 3 T Achieva MR/ Sonalleve HIFU system. Gross tumour volume (GTV) and planning target volume (PTV) were delineated on T 2W and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Achievable treatment volumes that (i) assumed bowel and/or urogenital tract preparation could be used to reduce risk of damage to organs-at-risk (TVoptimal), or (ii) assumed no preparations were possible (TVno-prep) were compared with PTV on virtual treatment plans. Patients were considered treatable if TVoptimal ≥ 50 % PTV. RESULTS: 11/20 patients (55%) were treatable if preparation strategies were used: nine had central pelvic recurrences, two had tumours in metastatic locations. Treatable volume ranged from 3.4 to 90.3 ml, representing 70 ± 17 % of PTVs. Without preparation, 6/20 (30%) patients were treatable (four central recurrences, two metastatic lesions). Limiting factors were disease beyond reach of the HIFU transducer, and bone obstructing tumour access. DWI assisted tumour outlining, but differences from T 2W imaging in GTV size (16.9 ± 23.0%) and PTV location (3.8 ± 2.8 mm in phase-encode direction) limited its use for treatment planning. CONCLUSIONS: Despite variation in size and location within the pelvis, ≥ 50 % of tumour volumes were considered targetable in 55 % patients while avoiding adjacent critical structures. A prospective treatment study will assess safety and symptom relief in a second patient cohort. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Target size, location and access make MRgHIFU a viable treatment modality for treating symptomatic recurrent gynaecological tumours within the pelvis.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent20181037 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBRITISH INST RADIOLOGY
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectGenital Neoplasms, Female
dc.subjectNeoplasm Recurrence, Local
dc.subjectTumor Burden
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectFeasibility Studies
dc.subjectPilot Projects
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional
dc.subjectPatient Positioning
dc.subjectHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation
dc.titleMR guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) for treating recurrent gynaecological tumours: a pilot feasibility study.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-04-01
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1259/bjr.20181037
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-06
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfThe British journal of radiology
pubs.issue1098
pubs.notesNo embargo
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Therapeutic Ultrasound
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Therapeutic Ultrasound
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume92
pubs.embargo.termsNo embargo
icr.researchteamMagnetic Resonance
icr.researchteamTherapeutic Ultrasound
dc.contributor.icrauthorRivens, Ian
dc.contributor.icrauthorTer Haar, Gail
dc.contributor.icrauthordeSouza, Nandita


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0