Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrunt, AM
dc.contributor.authorHaviland, JS
dc.contributor.authorKirby, AM
dc.contributor.authorSomaiah, N
dc.contributor.authorWheatley, DA
dc.contributor.authorBliss, JM
dc.contributor.authorYarnold, JR
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-30T11:44:12Z
dc.date.available2021-06-30T11:44:12Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-10
dc.identifier.citationClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2021, 33 (7), pp. 430 - 439
dc.identifier.issn0936-6555
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4651
dc.identifier.eissn1433-2981
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clon.2021.04.016
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: The phase 3 FAST-Forward trial reported outcomes for 26 and 27 Gy schedules delivered in 5 fractions over 1 week versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks in 4000 patients. We discuss concerns raised by the radiotherapy community in relation to implementing this schedule. IPSILATERAL BREAST TUMOUR RELAPSE (IBTR): Published estimated 5-year IBTR with 95% CI after 40 Gy in 15 fractions was 2.1% (95% CI 1.4-3.1), 1.7% (1.2-1.6) after 27 Gy and 1.4% (0.2-2.2) after 26 Gy, emphatically showing non-inferiority of the 5-fraction regimens. Subgroup analyses comparing IBTR in 26 Gy versus 40 Gy show no evidence of differential effect regarding age, grade, pathological tumour size, nodal status, tumour bed boost, adjuvant chemotherapy, HER2 status and triple negative status. The number of events in these analyses is small and results should be interpreted with caution. There was only 1 IBTR event post-mastectomy. NORMAL TISSUE EFFECTS: The 26 Gy schedule, on the basis of similar NTE to 40 Gy in 15 fractions, is the recommended regimen for clinical implementation. There is a low absolute rate of moderate/marked NTE, these are predominantly moderate not severe change. Subgroup analyses comparing clinician-assessed moderate or marked adverse effect for 26 Gy versus 40 Gy show no evidence of differential effects according to age, breast size, surgical deficit, tumour bed boost, or adjuvant chemotherapy. RADIOBIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The design of the FAST-Forward trial does not control for time-related effects, and the ability to interpret clinical outcomes in terms of underlying biology is limited. There could conceivably be a time-effect for tumour control. A slight reduction in α/β estimate for the late normal tissue effects of test regimens might be a chance effect, but if real could reflect fewer consequential late effects due to lower rates of moist desquamation. CONCLUSION: The 26 Gy 5-fraction daily regimen for breast radiotherapy can be implemented now.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent430 - 439
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleFive-fraction Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer: FAST-Forward to Implementation.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-04-29
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.clon.2021.04.016
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
pubs.issue7
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Translational Breast Radiobiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Translational Breast Radiobiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusAccepted
pubs.volume33
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamClinical Trials & Statistics Unit
icr.researchteamBreast Cancer Radiotherapy
icr.researchteamTranslational Breast Radiobiology
icr.researchteamClinical Trials & Statistics Unit
icr.researchteamBreast Cancer Radiotherapy
icr.researchteamTranslational Breast Radiobiology
dc.contributor.icrauthorHaviland, Joanne
dc.contributor.icrauthorSomaiah, Navita
dc.contributor.icrauthorBliss, Judith
dc.contributor.icrauthorYarnold, John


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0