Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYu, G
dc.contributor.authorRice, S
dc.contributor.authorHeer, R
dc.contributor.authorLewis, R
dc.contributor.authorVadiveloo, T
dc.contributor.authorMariappan, P
dc.contributor.authorPenegar, S
dc.contributor.authorClark, E
dc.contributor.authorTandogdu, Z
dc.contributor.authorHall, E
dc.contributor.authorVale, L
dc.coverage.spatialNetherlands
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-09T11:17:03Z
dc.date.available2024-08-09T11:17:03Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-01
dc.identifierS2666-1683(23)00243-4
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Urology Open Science, 2023, 53 pp. 67 - 77en_US
dc.identifier.issn2666-1691
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/6349
dc.identifier.eissn2666-1683
dc.identifier.eissn2666-1683
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.euros.2023.05.003
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.euros.2023.05.003
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Recurrence of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is common after transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). Photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) may reduce recurrence. PDD uses a photosensitiser in the bladder that causes the tumour to fluoresce to guide resection. PDD provides better diagnostic accuracy and allows more complete tumour resection. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the economic efficiency of PDD-guided TURBT (PDD-TURBT) in comparison to white light-guided TURNT (WL-TURBT) in individuals with a suspected first diagnosis of NMIBC at intermediate or high risk of recurrence on the basis of routine visual assessment before being scheduled for TURBT. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a health economic evaluation alongside a pragmatic, open-label, parallel-group randomised trial from a societal perspective. A total of 493 participants (aged ≥16 yr) were randomly allocated to PDD-TURBT (n = 244) or WL-TURBT (n = 249) in 22 UK National Health Service hospitals. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Cost effectiveness ratios were based on the use of health care resources associated with PDD-TURBT and WL-TURBT and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained within the trial. Uncertainties in key parameters were assessed using sensitivity analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: On the basis of the use of resources driven by the trial protocol, the incremental cost effectiveness of PDD-TURBT in comparison to WL-TURBT was not cost saving. At 3 yr, the total cost was £12 881 for PDD-TURBT and £12 005 for WL-TURBT. QALYs at three years were 2.087 for PDD-TURBT and 2.094 for WL-TURBT. The probability that PDD-TURBT is cost effective was never >30% above the range of societal cost-effectiveness thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of a difference in either costs or QALYs over 3-yr follow-up between PDD-TURBT and WL-TURBT in individuals with suspected intermediate- or high-risk NMIBC. PDD-TURBT is not supported for the management of primary intermediate- or high-risk NMIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We assessed overall costs for two approaches for removal of bladder tumours in noninvasive cancer and measured quality-adjusted life years gained for each. We found that use of a photosensitiser in the bladder was not more cost effective than use of white light only during tumour removal.
dc.formatElectronic-eCollection
dc.format.extent67 - 77
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIERen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Urology Open Science
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectCost effectiveness
dc.subjectHexvix
dc.subjectNon–muscle-invasive bladder cancer
dc.subjectPhotodynamic diagnosis
dc.subjectRandomised trial
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.subjectTransurethral resection of bladder tumour
dc.subjectUrinary bladder neoplasms
dc.titlePhotodynamic Diagnosis-guided Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour in Participants with a First Suspected Diagnosis of Intermediate- or High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Cost-effectiveness Analysis Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial.en_US
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-05-12
dc.date.updated2024-08-08T09:38:51Z
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.euros.2023.05.003en_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-07-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441343
pubs.organisational-groupICR
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.publication-statusPublished online
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.05.003
pubs.volume53
icr.researchteamClin Trials & Stats Uniten_US
dc.contributor.icrauthorLewis, Rebecca
dc.contributor.icrauthorPenegar, Steven
dc.contributor.icrauthorHall, Emma
icr.provenanceDeposited by Ms Jessica Phelps (impersonating Prof Emma Hall) on 2024-08-08. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: Photodynamic Diagnosis-guided Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour in Participants with a First Suspected Diagnosis of .pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/