Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKilburn, LS
dc.contributor.authorAresu, M
dc.contributor.authorBanerji, J
dc.contributor.authorBarrett-Lee, P
dc.contributor.authorEllis, P
dc.contributor.authorBliss, JM
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-07T15:03:01Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-23
dc.identifier.citationTrials, 2017, 18 (1), pp. 561 - ?
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/966
dc.identifier.eissn1745-6215
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13063-017-2308-6
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating new cancer treatments. They are, however, expensive to conduct, particularly where long-term follow-up of participants is required. Tracking participants via routine datasets could provide a cost-effective alternative for ascertaining follow-up information required to evaluate disease outcomes. This project explores the potential for routine data to inform cancer trials, using, the historical National Cancer Data Repository (NCDR) for English NHS sites and, for validation, mature data available from the TACT trial. METHODS: Datasets were matched using patients' NHS number, date of birth (dob) and name/initials. Demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes were assessed for agreement and completeness. Overall survival was compared between NCDR and TACT. RESULTS: A total of 3151 patients underwent linkage; 3047 (96.7%) of which had matched records. Extensive cleaning was required for some registry data fields, e.g. cause of death, whilst others had large amounts of missing data, e.g. tumour size (22.1%). Other data had high levels of matching such as dob (99.6%) and date of death (89.6%). There was no evidence of differential survival rates (8-year survival: TACT = 75% (95% CI 73, 76); NCDR = 76% (95% CI 74, 77)). CONCLUSIONS: Data quality and completeness requires improvement before routine data could be used for RCTs. Introduction of new routine datasets, including COSD, is welcomed although reporting of disease-recurrence events remains a concern. Prospective validation of such datasets is required before RCTs can confidently switch patient follow-up to utilise routinely collected NHS-based data. TACT TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00033683 , registered on 9 April 2002; ISRCTN79718493 , registered on 1 July 2001.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extent561 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMC
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectDisease Progression
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subjectDisease-Free Survival
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectMedical Record Linkage
dc.subjectRegistries
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.subjectDatabases, Factual
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectState Medicine
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subjectData Mining
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom
dc.titleCan routine data be used to support cancer clinical trials? A historical baseline on which to build: retrospective linkage of data from the TACT (CRUK 01/001) breast cancer trial and the National Cancer Data Repository.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-11-27
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s13063-017-2308-6
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-11-23
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfTrials
pubs.issue1
pubs.notesNo embargo
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume18
pubs.embargo.termsNo embargo
icr.researchteamClinical Trials & Statistics Unit
dc.contributor.icrauthorKilburn, Lucy
dc.contributor.icrauthorBliss, Judith


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0