Dose-escalated Adaptive Radiotherapy for Bladder Cancer: Results of the Phase 2 RAIDER Randomised Controlled Trial.
Loading...
Embargo End Date
Authors
Huddart, R
Hafeez, S
Griffin, C
Choudhury, A
Foroudi, F
Syndikus, I
Hindson, B
Webster, A
McNair, H
Birtle, A
Varughese, M
Henry, A
McLaren, DB
Parikh, O
Nikapota, A
Tang, C
Patel, E
Miles, E
Warren-Oseni, K
Kron, T
Hill, C
Philipps, L
Vassallo-Bonner, C
Cheung, KC
Gribble, H
Lewis, R
Hall, E
Hafeez, S
Griffin, C
Choudhury, A
Foroudi, F
Syndikus, I
Hindson, B
Webster, A
McNair, H
Birtle, A
Varughese, M
Henry, A
McLaren, DB
Parikh, O
Nikapota, A
Tang, C
Patel, E
Miles, E
Warren-Oseni, K
Kron, T
Hill, C
Philipps, L
Vassallo-Bonner, C
Cheung, KC
Gribble, H
Lewis, R
Hall, E
Document Type
Journal Article
Date
2024-09-24
Date Accepted
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Delivering radiotherapy to the bladder is challenging as it is a mobile, deformable structure. Dose-escalated adaptive image-guided radiotherapy could improve outcomes. RAIDER aimed to demonstrate the safety of such a schedule. METHODS: RAIDER is an international phase 2 noncomparative randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN26779187). Patients with unifocal T2-T4a urothelial bladder cancer were randomised (1:1:2) to standard whole bladder radiotherapy (WBRT), standard-dose adaptive radiotherapy (SART), or dose-escalated adaptive radiotherapy (DART). Two fractionation (f) schedules recruited independently. WBRT and SART dose was 55 Gy/20f or 64 Gy/32f, and DART dose was 60 Gy/20f or 70 Gy/32f. For SART and DART, a radiotherapy plan (small, medium, or large) was chosen daily. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with radiotherapy-related late Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3 toxicity; the trial was designed to rule out >20% toxicity with DART. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 345 patients were randomised between October 2015 and April 2020: 41/46 WBRT, 41/46 SART, and 81/90 DART patients in the 20f/32f cohorts, respectively. The median age was 72/73 yr; 78%/85% had T2 tumours, 46%/52% had neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 70%/71% had radiosensitising therapy. The median follow-up was 42.1/38.2 mo. Sixty-six of 77 (86%) 20f and 74 of 82 (90%) 32f participants planned for DART met the mandatory medium plan dose constraints. Radiotherapy-related grade ≥3 toxicity was reported in one of 58 patients (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.1, 7.9) with 20f DART and zero of 56 patients with 32f DART. Two-year overall survival was 77% (95% CI 69, 82) for WBRT + SART and 80% (95% CI 73, 85) for DART (hazard ratio = 0.84, 95% CI 0.59, 1.21, p = 0.4). Thirteen of 345 (3.8%) participants had salvage cystectomy. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Grade ≥3 late toxicity was low. DART was safe and feasible to deliver, meeting preset toxicity thresholds. Disease-related outcomes are promising for dose-escalated treatments, with a low salvage cystectomy rate and overall survival similar to that seen in cystectomy cohorts.
Citation
European Urology, 2024,
Source Title
European Urology
Publisher
ELSEVIER
ISSN
0302-2838
eISSN
Collections
Research Team
Clinic Acad RT Huddart
Clin Trials & Stats Unit
Clin Trials & Stats Unit