BEECH: a dose-finding run-in followed by a randomised phase II study assessing the efficacy of AKT inhibitor capivasertib (AZD5363) combined with paclitaxel in patients with estrogen receptor-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer, and in a PIK3CA mutant sub-population.
Loading...
ICR Authors
Authors
Turner, NC
Alarcón, E
Armstrong, AC
Philco, M
López Chuken, YA
Sablin, M-P
Tamura, K
Gómez Villanueva, A
Pérez-Fidalgo, JA
Cheung, SYA
Corcoran, C
Cullberg, M
Davies, BR
de Bruin, EC
Foxley, A
Lindemann, JPO
Maudsley, R
Moschetta, M
Outhwaite, E
Pass, M
Rugman, P
Schiavon, G
Oliveira, M
Alarcón, E
Armstrong, AC
Philco, M
López Chuken, YA
Sablin, M-P
Tamura, K
Gómez Villanueva, A
Pérez-Fidalgo, JA
Cheung, SYA
Corcoran, C
Cullberg, M
Davies, BR
de Bruin, EC
Foxley, A
Lindemann, JPO
Maudsley, R
Moschetta, M
Outhwaite, E
Pass, M
Rugman, P
Schiavon, G
Oliveira, M
Document Type
Journal Article
Date
2019-05-01
Date Accepted
Date Available
Abstract
BACKGROUND: BEECH investigated the efficacy of capivasertib (AZD5363), an oral inhibitor of AKT isoforms 1-3, in combination with the first-line weekly paclitaxel for advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, and in a phosphoinositide 3-kinase, catalytic, alpha polypeptide mutation sub-population (PIK3CA+). PATIENTS AND METHODS: BEECH consisted of an open-label, phase Ib safety run-in (part A) in 38 patients with advanced breast cancer, and a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase II expansion (part B) in 110 women with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. In part A, patients received paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 (days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) with capivasertib taken twice daily (b.i.d.) at two intermittent ascending dosing schedules. In part B, patients were randomly assigned, stratified by PIK3CA mutation status, to receive paclitaxel with either capivasertib or placebo. The primary end point for part A was safety to recommend a dose and schedule for part B; primary end points for part B were progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall and PIK3CA+ sub-population. RESULTS: Capivasertib was well tolerated, with a 400 mg b.i.d. 4 days on/3 days off treatment schedule selected in part A. In part B, median PFS in the overall population was 10.9 months with capivasertib versus 8.4 months with placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.80; P = 0.308]. In the PIK3CA+ sub-population, median PFS was 10.9 months with capivasertib versus 10.8 months with placebo (HR 1.11; P = 0.760). Based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event v4.0, the most common grade ≥3 adverse events in the capivasertib group were diarrhoea, hyperglycaemia, neutropoenia and maculopapular rash. Dose intensity of paclitaxel was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Capivasertib had no apparent impact on the tolerability and dose intensity of paclitaxel. Adding capivasertib to weekly paclitaxel did not prolong PFS in the overall population or PIK3CA+ sub-population of ER+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer patients.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01625286.
Citation
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2019, 30 (5), pp. 774 - 780
Source Title
Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
ISSN
0923-7534
eISSN
1569-8041
Collections
Research Team
Molecular Oncology