Factors affecting accuracy and precision in ultrasound guided radiotherapy.
Loading...
Embargo End Date
ICR Authors
Authors
Grimwood, A
Thomas, K
Kember, S
Aldis, G
Lawes, R
Brigden, B
Francis, J
Henegan, E
Kerner, M
Delacroix, L
Gordon, A
Tree, A
Harris, EJ
McNair, HA
Thomas, K
Kember, S
Aldis, G
Lawes, R
Brigden, B
Francis, J
Henegan, E
Kerner, M
Delacroix, L
Gordon, A
Tree, A
Harris, EJ
McNair, HA
Document Type
Journal Article
Date
2021-04-01
Date Accepted
2021-05-11
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is used clinically for directly assessing prostate motion. Factors affecting accuracy and precision in TPUS motion estimation must be assessed to realise its full potential. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were imaged using volumetric TPUS during the Clarity-Pro trial (NCT02388308). Prostate motion was measured online at patient set-up and offline by experienced observers. Cone beam CT with markers was used as a comparator and observer performance was also quantified. The influence of different clinical factors was examined to establish specific recommendations towards efficacious ultrasound guided radiotherapy. RESULTS: From 330 fractions in 22 patients, offline observer random errors were 1.5 mm, 1.3 mm, 1.9 mm (left-right, superior-inferior, anteroposterior respectively). Errors increased in fractions exhibiting poor image quality to 3.3 mm, 3.3 mm and 6.8 mm. Poor image quality was associated with inconsistent probe placement, large anatomical changes and unfavourable imaging conditions within the patient. Online matching exhibited increased observer errors of: 3.2 mm, 2.9 mm and 4.7 mm. Four patients exhibited large systematic residual errors, of which three had poor quality images. Patient habitus showed no correlation with observer error, residual error, or image quality. CONCLUSIONS: TPUS offers the unique potential to directly assess inter- and intra-fraction motion on conventional linacs. Inconsistent image quality, inexperienced operators and the pressures of the clinical environment may degrade precision and accuracy. Experienced operators are essential and cross-centre standards for training and QA should be established that build upon current guidance. Greater use of automation technologies may further minimise uncertainties.
Citation
Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2021, 18 pp. 68 - 77
Source Title
Publisher
ELSEVIER
ISSN
2405-6316
eISSN
2405-6316