Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSzijgyarto, Z
dc.contributor.authorFlach, KD
dc.contributor.authorOpdam, M
dc.contributor.authorPalmieri, C
dc.contributor.authorLinn, SC
dc.contributor.authorWesseling, J
dc.contributor.authorAli, S
dc.contributor.authorBliss, JM
dc.contributor.authorCheang, MCU
dc.contributor.authorZwart, W
dc.contributor.authorCoombes, RC
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-30T14:39:05Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-01
dc.identifier.citationBreast cancer research and treatment, 2019, 175 (1), pp. 149 - 163
dc.identifier.issn0167-6806
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/3037
dc.identifier.eissn1573-7217
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10549-018-05110-x
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: The prognostic and predictive values of the MAPK/AKT/ERα phosphorylation axis (pT202/T204MAPK, pT308AKT, pS473AKT, pS118ERα and pS167ERα) in primary tumours were assessed to determine whether these markers can differentiate between patient responses for switching adjuvant endocrine therapy after 2-3 years from tamoxifen to exemestane and continued tamoxifen monotherapy in the Intergroup Exemestane Study (IES). METHODS: Of the 4724 patients in IES, 1506 were managed in a subset of centres (N = 89) participating in PathIES. These centres recruited 1282 (85%, 1282/1506) women into PathIES of whom 1036 had phospho-marker data. All phospho-markers were analysed by immunohistochemistry staining. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models of the phospho-markers for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were adjusted for clinicopathological factors. Treatment effects on the biomarker expression were determined by interaction tests. Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment for multiple testing with a false discovery rate of 10% was applied (pBH). RESULTS: Phospho-T202/T204MAPK, pS118ERα and pS167ERα were all found to be correlated (pBH = 0.0002). These markers were not associated with either DFS or OS when controlling for the established clinicopathological factors. Interaction terms between the phospho-markers and treatment strategies for either DFS or OS were not statistically significant (pBH > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: This PathIES study confirmed previously described associations between the phosphorylation site markers of AKT, MAPK and ERα activity in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. No prognostic correlations between the phosphorylation markers and clinical outcome were found, nor were they predictive for clinical outcomes among patients who switched therapy over those treated with tamoxifen alone.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent149 - 163
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectTamoxifen
dc.subjectAndrostadienes
dc.subjectMitogen-Activated Protein Kinases
dc.subjectReceptors, Estrogen
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Agents
dc.subjectNeoplasm Staging
dc.subjectPrognosis
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectImmunohistochemistry
dc.subjectPhosphorylation
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectProto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt
dc.subjectKaplan-Meier Estimate
dc.subjectNeoplasm Grading
dc.titleDissecting the predictive value of MAPK/AKT/estrogen-receptor phosphorylation axis in primary breast cancer to treatment response for tamoxifen over exemestane: a Translational Report of the Intergroup Exemestane Study (IES)-PathIES.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-12-18
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s10549-018-05110-x
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-05
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfBreast cancer research and treatment
pubs.issue1
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Genomic Analysis – Clinical Trials
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Genomic Analysis – Clinical Trials
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume175
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamClinical Trials & Statistics Unit
icr.researchteamGenomic Analysis – Clinical Trials
dc.contributor.icrauthorBliss, Judith
dc.contributor.icrauthorCheang, Chon


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0