Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorde Bono, JS
dc.contributor.authorChowdhury, S
dc.contributor.authorFeyerabend, S
dc.contributor.authorElliott, T
dc.contributor.authorGrande, E
dc.contributor.authorMelhem-Bertrandt, A
dc.contributor.authorBaron, B
dc.contributor.authorHirmand, M
dc.contributor.authorWerbrouck, P
dc.contributor.authorFizazi, K
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-17T09:13:37Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-01
dc.identifier.citationEuropean urology, 2018, 74 (1), pp. 37 - 45
dc.identifier.issn0302-2838
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/3294
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7560
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.035
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone, which target the androgen receptor axis, have expanded the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Retrospective analyses suggest some cross-resistance between these two drugs when used sequentially, but robust, prospective studies have not yet been reported. OBJECTIVE: To fulfil a regulatory postregistration commitment by evaluating the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who progressed following abiraterone acetate plus prednisone treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicentre, single-arm, open-label study, enrolled patients with progressing mCRPC after ≥24 wk of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone treatment. All patients maintained castration therapy during the trial. Prior chemotherapy was allowed but not required. INTERVENTION: Patients received enzalutamide 160mg/d orally. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and time-to-PSA progression. Safety data were also assessed. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to descriptively analyse time-to-event endpoints. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 214 patients received enzalutamide treatment, 145 of whom were chemotherapy-naïve. Median radiographic progression-free survival was 8.1 mo (95% confidence interval: 6.1-8.3); median overall survival had not been reached. Unconfirmed PSA response rate was 27% (48 of 181). Median time-to-PSA progression was 5.7 mo (95% confidence interval: 5.6-5.8). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue (32%), decreased appetite (25%), asthenia (18%), back pain (17%), and arthralgia (16%). No seizures were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Enzalutamide showed antitumour activity in some patients with mCRPC who had previously progressed following ≥24 wk of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with mCRPC who progressed on previous abiraterone acetate plus prednisone treatment, with or without prior chemotherapy, received enzalutamide. Although cross-resistance between the two agents was observed in a majority of patients, some still benefited from enzalutamide treatment.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent37 - 45
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectDisease Progression
dc.subjectPhenylthiohydantoin
dc.subjectPrednisone
dc.subjectAndrogen Antagonists
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectDrug Resistance, Neoplasm
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectEurope
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
dc.subjectAbiraterone Acetate
dc.titleAntitumour Activity and Safety of Enzalutamide in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated with Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone for ≥24 weeks in Europe.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-07-26
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.035
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-07
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfEuropean urology
pubs.issue1
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume74
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamProstate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
dc.contributor.icrauthorDe Bono, Johann


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0