Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSuzuki, H
dc.contributor.authorCastellano, D
dc.contributor.authorde Bono, J
dc.contributor.authorSternberg, CN
dc.contributor.authorFizazi, K
dc.contributor.authorTombal, B
dc.contributor.authorWülfing, C
dc.contributor.authorFoster, MC
dc.contributor.authorOzatilgan, A
dc.contributor.authorGeffriaud-Ricouard, C
dc.contributor.authorde Wit, R
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-21T08:49:50Z
dc.date.available2021-04-21T08:49:50Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-01
dc.identifier.citationJapanese journal of clinical oncology, 2021
dc.identifier.issn0368-2811
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4529
dc.identifier.eissn1465-3621
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jjco/hyab028
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: In the CARD study (NCT02485691), cabazitaxel significantly improved clinical outcomes versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and the alternative androgen-signalling-targeted inhibitor. However, some patients received docetaxel or the prior alternative androgen-signalling-targeted inhibitor in the metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) setting. Therefore, the CARD results cannot be directly translated to a Japanese population. METHODS: Patients (N = 255) received cabazitaxel (25 mg/m2 IV Q3W, prednisone, G-CSF) versus abiraterone (1000 mg PO, prednisone) or enzalutamide (160 mg PO) after prior docetaxel and progression ≤12 months on the alternative androgen-signalling-targeted inhibitor. Patients who received combination therapy for mHSPC were excluded (n = 33) as docetaxel is not approved in this setting in Japan. RESULTS: A total of 222 patients (median age 70 years) were included in this subanalysis. Median number of cycles was higher for cabazitaxel versus androgen-signalling-targeted inhibitors (7 versus 4). Clinical outcomes favoured cabazitaxel over abiraterone or enzalutamide including, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; median 8.2 versus 3.4 months; P < 0.0001), overall survival (OS; 13.9 versus 11.8 months; P = 0.0102), PFS (4.4 versus 2.7 months; P < 0.0001), confirmed prostate-specific antigen response (37.0 versus 14.4%; P = 0.0006) and objective tumour response (38.9 versus 11.4%; P = 0.0036). For cabazitaxel versus androgen-signalling-targeted inhibitor, grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 55% versus 44% of patients, with adverse events leading to death on study in 2.7% versus 5.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Cabazitaxel significantly improved outcomes including rPFS and OS versus abiraterone or enzalutamide and are reflective of the Japanese patient population. Cabazitaxel should be considered the preferred treatment option over abiraterone or enzalutamide in this setting.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOXFORD UNIV PRESS
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleCabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: post hoc analysis of the CARD study excluding chemohormonal therapy for castrate-naive disease.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-02-16
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/jjco/hyab028
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-03-19
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfJapanese journal of clinical oncology
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamProstate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
icr.researchteamProstate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
dc.contributor.icrauthorDe Bono, Johann


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0