Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEvans, CP
dc.contributor.authorHigano, CS
dc.contributor.authorKeane, T
dc.contributor.authorAndriole, G
dc.contributor.authorSaad, F
dc.contributor.authorIversen, P
dc.contributor.authorMiller, K
dc.contributor.authorKim, C-S
dc.contributor.authorKimura, G
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, AJ
dc.contributor.authorSternberg, CN
dc.contributor.authorLoriot, Y
dc.contributor.authorde Bono, J
dc.contributor.authorNoonberg, SB
dc.contributor.authorMansbach, H
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharya, S
dc.contributor.authorPerabo, F
dc.contributor.authorBeer, TM
dc.contributor.authorTombal, B
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-01T15:43:21Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-01
dc.identifier.citationEuropean urology, 2016, 70 (4), pp. 675 - 683
dc.identifier.issn0302-2838
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/458
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7560
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.017
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Enzalutamide, an oral androgen receptor inhibitor, significantly improved overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) versus placebo in the PREVAIL trial of men with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of enzalutamide versus placebo in patients from PREVAIL based on site and extent of baseline disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: One thousand seven hundred and seventeen asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients were randomized to enzalutamide (n=872) or placebo (n=845). Subgroup analyses included nonvisceral (only bone and/or nodal; n=1513), visceral (lung and/or liver; n=204), low-volume bone disease (<4 bone metastases; n=867), high-volume bone disease (≥4 bone metastases; n=850), lymph node only disease (n=195). INTERVENTION: Oral enzalutamide (160mg) or placebo once daily while continuing androgen deprivation therapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Coprimary endpoints (rPFS, OS) were prospectively evaluated in nonvisceral and visceral subgroups. All other efficacy analyses were post hoc. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Enzalutamide improved rPFS versus placebo in patients with nonvisceral disease (hazard ratio [HR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.22), visceral disease (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.16-0.49), low- or high-volume bone disease (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.11-0.22; HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.16-0.29, respectively), and lymph node only disease (HR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.04-0.19). For OS, HRs favored enzalutamide (<1) across all disease subgroups, although 95% CI was >1 in patients with visceral disease (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55-1.23). Enzalutamide was well tolerated in patients with or without visceral disease. CONCLUSIONS: Enzalutamide provided clinically significant benefits in men with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, with or without visceral disease, low- or high-volume bone disease, or lymph node only disease. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer-including those with or without visceral disease or widespread bone disease-benefitted from enzalutamide, an active well-tolerated therapy.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent675 - 683
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
dc.rights.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectBone Neoplasms
dc.subjectLiver Neoplasms
dc.subjectLung Neoplasms
dc.subjectLymphatic Metastasis
dc.subjectPhenylthiohydantoin
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Agents
dc.subjectDisease-Free Survival
dc.subjectTumor Burden
dc.subjectSurvival Rate
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectDouble-Blind Method
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectAndrogen Receptor Antagonists
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
dc.titleThe PREVAIL Study: Primary Outcomes by Site and Extent of Baseline Disease for Enzalutamide-treated Men with Chemotherapy-naïve Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-03-04
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.017
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-10
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfEuropean urology
pubs.issue4
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume70
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamProstate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
dc.contributor.icrauthorDe Bono, Johann


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record