Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDelanoy, N
dc.contributor.authorRobbrecht, D
dc.contributor.authorEisenberger, M
dc.contributor.authorSartor, O
dc.contributor.authorde Wit, R
dc.contributor.authorMercier, F
dc.contributor.authorGeffriaud-Ricouard, C
dc.contributor.authorde Bono, J
dc.contributor.authorOudard, S
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-10T15:23:03Z
dc.date.available2021-06-10T15:23:03Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-13
dc.identifier.citationCancers, 2021, 13 (6)en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-6694
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4609
dc.identifier.eissn2072-6694en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2072-6694
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/cancers13061284en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/cancers13061284
dc.description.abstract<h4>Background</h4>In the PROSELICA phase III trial (NCT01308580), cabazitaxel 20 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (CABA20) was non-inferior to cabazitaxel 25 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (CABA25) in mCRPC patients previously treated with docetaxel (DOC). The present post hoc analysis evaluates how the type of progression at randomization affected outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>Progression type at randomization was defined as follows: PSA progression only (PSA-p; no radiological progression (RADIO-p), no pain), RADIO-p (±PSA-p, no pain), or pain progression (PAIN-p, ±PSA-p, ±RADIO-p). Relationships between progression type and overall survival (OS), radiological progression-free survival (rPFS), and PSA response (confirmed PSA decrease ≥ 50%) were analyzed.<h4>Results</h4>All randomized patients (<i>n</i> = 1200) had received prior DOC, and 25.7% had received prior abiraterone or enzalutamide. Progression type at randomization was evaluable in 1075 patients (PSA-p = 24.4%, RADIO-p = 20.8%, PAIN-p = 54.8%). Pain progression was associated with clinical and biological features of aggressive disease. Median OS from CABA initiation or date of mCRPC diagnosis, all arms combined, was shorter in the PAIN-p group than in the RADIO-p or the PSA-p groups (12.0 versus 16.8 and 18.4 months, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, all arms combined, PAIN-p was an independent predictor of poor OS (HR = 1.44, <i>p</i> < 0.001). PSA response, rPFS, and OS were numerically higher with CABA25 versus CABA20 in patients with PAIN-p.<h4>Conclusions</h4>This post hoc analysis of the PROSELICA phase III study shows that pain progression at initiation of CABA in mCRPC patients previously treated with DOC is associated with a poor prognosis. Disease progression should be carefully monitored, even in the absence of PSA rise.en_US
dc.formatElectronicen_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.titlePain Progression at Initiation of Cabazitaxel in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): A Post Hoc Analysis of the PROSELICA Study.en_US
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-03-07
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3390/cancers13061284en_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-03-13
dc.relation.isPartOfCancersen_US
pubs.issue6en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume13en_US
pubs.embargo.termsNot knownen_US
icr.researchteamProstate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
dc.contributor.icrauthorDe Bono, Johannen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/