Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBellmunt, J
dc.contributor.authorKheoh, T
dc.contributor.authorYu, MK
dc.contributor.authorSmith, MR
dc.contributor.authorSmall, EJ
dc.contributor.authorMulders, PFA
dc.contributor.authorFizazi, K
dc.contributor.authorRathkopf, DE
dc.contributor.authorSaad, F
dc.contributor.authorScher, HI
dc.contributor.authorTaplin, M-E
dc.contributor.authorDavis, ID
dc.contributor.authorSchrijvers, D
dc.contributor.authorProtheroe, A
dc.contributor.authorMolina, A
dc.contributor.authorDe Porre, P
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, TW
dc.contributor.authorde Bono, JS
dc.contributor.authorRyan, CJ
dc.contributor.authorOudard, S
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-01T17:52:38Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-01
dc.identifier.citationEuropean urology, 2016, 69 (5), pp. 924 - 932
dc.identifier.issn0302-2838
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/463
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7560
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.021
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The duration of prior hormonal treatment can predict responses to subsequent therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). OBJECTIVE: To determine if prior endocrine therapy duration is an indicator of abiraterone acetate (AA) sensitivity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Post-hoc exploratory analysis of randomised phase 3 studies examining post-docetaxel (COU-AA-301) or chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC (COU-AA-302) patients receiving AA. The treatment effect on overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response analysed by quartile duration of prior gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) or androgen receptor (AR) antagonist. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised to AA (1000mg, orally once daily) plus prednisone (5mg, orally twice daily) or placebo plus prednisone. Prior endocrine therapy was GnRHa (COU-AA-301, n=1127 [94%]; COU-AA-302, n=1057 [97%], 45.1 mo or 36.7 mo median duration, respectively) and/or orchiectomy (COU-AA-301, n=78 [7%] COU-AA-302, n=44 [4%]); castrated patients received prior AR antagonists (COU-AA-301, n=1015 [85%]; COU-AA-302, n=1078 [99%], 15.7 mo or 16.1 mo median duration, respectively). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Cox model was used to obtain hazard ratio and associated 95% confidence interval with statistical inference by log rank statistic. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Clinical benefit with AA was observed for OS, rPFS, and PSA response for nearly all quartiles with GnRHa or AR antagonists in both COU-AA-301 and COU-AA-302. In COU-AA-301, patients with a longer duration of prior endocrine therapy tended to have greater AA OS, rPFS, and PSA response benefit, with lead-time chemotherapy bias potentially impacting COU-AA-301 results. Time to castration resistance was not captured. This analysis is limited as a post-hoc exploratory analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In the COU-AA-301 and COU-AA-302 studies, AA produced clinical benefits regardless of prior endocrine therapy duration in patients with mCRPC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients derived clinical benefits with abiraterone acetate regardless of prior endocrine therapy duration.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent924 - 932
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
dc.rights.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectNeoplasm Metastasis
dc.subjectTaxoids
dc.subjectPrednisone
dc.subjectProstate-Specific Antigen
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subjectDisease-Free Survival
dc.subjectRetreatment
dc.subjectOrchiectomy
dc.subjectSurvival Rate
dc.subjectDouble-Blind Method
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectGonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
dc.subjectAndrogen Receptor Antagonists
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
dc.subjectAbiraterone Acetate
dc.titlePrior Endocrine Therapy Impact on Abiraterone Acetate Clinical Efficacy in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post-hoc Analysis of Randomised Phase 3 Studies.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-10-06
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.021
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-05
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfEuropean urology
pubs.issue5
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume69
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamProstate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
dc.contributor.icrauthorDe Bono, Johann


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record