Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTree, A
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, C
dc.contributor.authorSyndikus, I
dc.contributor.authorBirtle, A
dc.contributor.authorChoudhury, A
dc.contributor.authorGraham, J
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, C
dc.contributor.authorKhoo, V
dc.contributor.authorMalik, Z
dc.contributor.authorO'Sullivan, J
dc.contributor.authorPanades, M
dc.contributor.authorParker, C
dc.contributor.authorRimmer, Y
dc.contributor.authorScrase, C
dc.contributor.authorStaffurth, J
dc.contributor.authorDearnaley, D
dc.contributor.authorHall, E
dc.contributor.authorCHHiP investigators,
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-12T15:09:34Z
dc.date.available2022-01-12T15:09:34Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-01
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2022
dc.identifier.issn0360-3016
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4955
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.160
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.160
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: CHHiP is a randomized trial evaluating moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy for treatment of localized prostate cancer. Of all participants, 97% of them had concurrent short-course hormone therapy (HT), either luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (LHRHa) or 150 mg of bicalutamide daily. This exploratory analysis compares efficacy and side effects in a nonrandomized comparison. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In our study, 2700 patients received LHRHa and 403 received bicalutamide. The primary endpoint was biochemical/clinical failure. Groups were compared with Cox regression adjusted for various prognostic factors and stratified by radiation therapy dose. A key secondary endpoint was erectile dysfunction (ED) assessed by clinicians (using scores from Late Effects on Normal Tissues: Subjective/Objective/Management [LENT-SOM] subjective erectile function for vaginal penetration) and patients (single items within the University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index [UCLA PCI] and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite [EPIC]-50 questionnaires) at 2 years and compared between HT regimens by χ2 trend test. RESULTS: Bicalutamide patients were significantly younger (median 67 vs 69 years LHRHa). Median follow-up was 9.3 years. There was no difference in biochemical or clinical failure with an adjusted hazard ratio or 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.23; P = .8). At 2 years, grade ≥2 LENT-SOM ED was reported in significantly more LHRHa patients (313 out of 590; 53%) versus bicalutamide (17 out of 68; 25%) (P < .0001). There were no differences in ED seen with UCLA-PCI and EPIC-50 questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: In this nonrandomized comparison, there was no evidence of a difference in efficacy according to type of HT received. Bicalutamide preserved clinician assessed (LENT-SOM) erectile function at 2 years but patient-reported outcomes were similar between groups.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
dc.titleNonrandomized Comparison of Efficacy and Side Effects of Bicalutamide Compared With Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) Analogs in Combination With Radiation Therapy in the CHHiP Trial.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-12-24
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.160
dc.relation.isPartOfInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Closed research teams
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Closed research teams/Clinical Academic Radiotherapy (Dearnaley)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamClinical Trials & Statistics Unit
icr.researchteamClinical Academic Radiotherapy (Dearnaley)
dc.contributor.icrauthorGriffin, Clare
dc.contributor.icrauthorDearnaley, David
dc.contributor.icrauthorHall, Emma


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record