Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoussa, O
dc.contributor.authorBhogal, RH
dc.contributor.authorMalietzis, G
dc.contributor.authorFribbens, C
dc.contributor.authorStarling, N
dc.contributor.authorGerlinger, M
dc.contributor.authorWatkins, D
dc.contributor.authorChau, I
dc.contributor.authorRao, S
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, D
dc.contributor.authorAllum, WH
dc.contributor.authorChaudry, A
dc.contributor.authorKumar, S
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-01T10:47:36Z
dc.date.available2022-04-01T10:47:36Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-06
dc.identifier.citationBJS open, 2022, 6 (1)
dc.identifier.issn2474-9842
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/5059
dc.identifier.eissn2474-9842
dc.identifier.eissn2474-9842
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjsopen/zrac003
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjsopen/zrac003
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Perioperative FLOT (fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) chemotherapy is a recent regimen used to treat resectable oesophagogastric (OG) adenocarcinoma, associated with improved overall survival versus earlier chemotherapy strategies. This study compared short-term perioperative morbidity in a large tertiary centre series of FLOT to a matched cohort receiving ECX/ECF (epirubicin, cisplatin, capecitabine (X) or 5-fluorouracil (F)). METHODS: Consecutive patients completing four perioperative cycles of FLOT and proceeding to surgery with resectable OG adenocarcinoma were included. This was matched to patients from a historic ECX/ECF cohort from the same institution. A propensity score was calculated, and a secondary analysis using a propensity-matched group performed. RESULTS: Cohorts were matched by tumour location and operations performed. In total there were 129 (64.5 per cent) oesophageal and 71 (35.5 per cent) gastric resections (FLOT 57 oesophageal, 43 gastric; ECF/ECX 64 oesophageal, 36 gastric). The median length of stay after surgery was 12 days in the FLOT group versus 15 in ECF/ECX (P = 0.035). There were no significant differences in overall perioperative complications and, specifically, no difference in OG anastomotic leaks, analysed by site (gastric (FLOT 0/79 (0 per cent) versus ECX 2/79 (2.5 per cent); P = 0.123), oesophageal (FLOT 4/121 (3.3 per cent) versus ECX 5/121 (4.1 per cent); P = 0.868) or type of surgery (open FLOT 1/121 (0.8 per cent) versus ECX 3/121 (2.5 per cent); P = 0.368; minimally invasive (FLOT 3/121 (2.5 per cent) versus ECX 2/121 (1.7 per cent); P = 0.555)). There was no statistical difference in leak-related return to theatre, 30-day (FLOT 0 (0 per cent) versus ECX 3/100 (3.0 per cent); P = 0.081), or 90-day (FLOT 0 (0 per cent) versus ECX 2/100 (2.0 per cent); P = 0.155) mortality. CONCLUSION: In terms of surgical complications, FLOT and ECX/ECF were equally safe in patients undergoing resection for OG adenocarcinoma.
dc.formatPrint
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOXFORD UNIV PRESS
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectAdenocarcinoma
dc.subjectStomach Neoplasms
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subjectPropensity Score
dc.subjectCapecitabine
dc.titleEffect of perioperative FLOT versus ECF/ECX on short-term outcomes after surgery for resectable oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma: propensity score-matched study.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-12-22
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/bjsopen/zrac003
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.relation.isPartOfBJS open
pubs.issue1
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Gastrointestinal Cancers Clinical Trials
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Gastrointestinal Cancers Clinical Trials/Gastrointestinal Cancers Clinical Trials (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Medicine (RMH Smith Cunningham)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Medicine (RMH Smith Cunningham)/Medicine (RMH Smith Cunningham) (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume6
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamGastrointestinal Cancers Clinical Trials
icr.researchteamMedicine (RMH Smith Cunningham)
dc.contributor.icrauthorBhogal, Ricky
dc.contributor.icrauthorGerlinger, Marco


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/