Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSpain, L
dc.contributor.authorWalls, G
dc.contributor.authorJulve, M
dc.contributor.authorO'Meara, K
dc.contributor.authorSchmid, T
dc.contributor.authorKalaitzaki, E
dc.contributor.authorTurajlic, S
dc.contributor.authorGore, M
dc.contributor.authorRees, J
dc.contributor.authorLarkin, J
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-24T14:34:06Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-01
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017, 28 (2), pp. 377 - 385
dc.identifier.issn0923-7534
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/505
dc.identifier.eissn1569-8041
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/annonc/mdw558
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) has greatly improved survival for patients with advanced melanoma in recent years. Anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD1 antibodies have been approved following large Phase III trials. Immune-related neurological toxicity of varying severity has been reported in the literature. The cumulative incidence of neurotoxicity among ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab is reported as <1% in published clinical trials. We aimed to identify the incidence of neurotoxicity in our institution across anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies, including the combination of ipilimumab with nivolumab. We also review the existing literature and propose an investigation and management algorithm. METHODS: All patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab or the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi + nivo), managed at the Royal Marsden Hospital between September 2010 and December 2015, including patients on (published) clinical trials were included. Medical records for each patient were reviewed and information on neurotoxicity recorded. A systematic search strategy was performed to collate existing reports of neurological toxicity. RESULTS: In total, 413 immunotherapy treatment episodes in 352 patients were included, with median follow-up of 26.7 months. Ten cases of neurotoxicity were recorded, affecting 2.8% of patients overall, ranging from grade 1 to 4, affecting both central and peripheral nervous systems. A rate of 14% was noted with ipi + nivo. Three of five patients commenced on corticosteroids responded to these. Six patients had made a full recovery at the time of reporting. A favorable radiological response was found in 7 of the 10 cases. Unusual presentations are described in detail. CONCLUSIONS: Neurological toxicity is not uncommon, and may be more frequent in patients treated with combination ipi + nivo. Patterns of presentation and response to treatment are varied. A prompt and considered approach is required to optimize outcomes in this group of patients.
dc.formatPrint
dc.format.extent377 - 385
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOXFORD UNIV PRESS
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMelanoma
dc.subjectSkin Neoplasms
dc.subjectNervous System Diseases
dc.subjectAntibodies, Monoclonal
dc.subjectDisease-Free Survival
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subjectAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Agents, Immunological
dc.subjectIpilimumab
dc.subjectNivolumab
dc.titleNeurotoxicity from immune-checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of melanoma: a single centre experience and review of the literature.
dc.typeJournal Article
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/annonc/mdw558
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
pubs.declined2017-03-23T13:54:25.23+0000
pubs.declined2017-03-23T13:54:25.23+0000
pubs.deleted2017-03-23T13:54:25.23+0000
pubs.issue2
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Melanoma and Kidney Cancer
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Melanoma and Kidney Cancer/Melanoma and Kidney Cancer (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Melanoma and Kidney Cancer
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Melanoma and Kidney Cancer/Melanoma and Kidney Cancer (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume28
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamMelanoma and Kidney Cancer
dc.contributor.icrauthorSpain, Lavinia
dc.contributor.icrauthorJulve, Maximilian


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record