Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTarhini, AA
dc.contributor.authorToor, K
dc.contributor.authorChan, K
dc.contributor.authorMcDermott, DF
dc.contributor.authorMohr, P
dc.contributor.authorLarkin, J
dc.contributor.authorHodi, FS
dc.contributor.authorLee, C-H
dc.contributor.authorRizzo, JI
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, H
dc.contributor.authorMoshyk, A
dc.contributor.authorRao, S
dc.contributor.authorKotapati, S
dc.contributor.authorAtkins, MB
dc.coverage.spatialEngland
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-19T12:02:43Z
dc.date.available2022-08-19T12:02:43Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-06
dc.identifierARTN 100050
dc.identifierS2059-7029(21)00004-1
dc.identifier.citationESMO Open, 2021, 6 (2), pp. 100050 -en_US
dc.identifier.issn2059-7029
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/5283
dc.identifier.eissn2059-7029
dc.identifier.eissn2059-7029
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Approved first-line treatments for patients with BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma include nivolumab (a programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor) plus ipilimumab (a cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 inhibitor; NIVO+IPI) and the BRAF/MEK inhibitors dabrafenib plus trametinib (DAB+TRAM), encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO+BINI), and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (VEM+COBI). Results from prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing these treatments have not yet been reported. This analysis evaluated the relative efficacy and safety of NIVO+IPI versus DAB+TRAM, ENCO+BINI, and VEM+COBI in patients with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review identified RCTs for DAB+TRAM, ENCO+BINI, and VEM+COBI in patients with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma. Individual patient-level data for NIVO+IPI were derived from the phase III CheckMate 067 trial (BRAF-mutant cohort) and restricted to match the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the comparator trials. Treatment effects for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards and time-varying hazard ratio (HR) models. Safety outcomes (grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events) with NIVO+IPI and the comparators were compared. RESULTS: In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, NIVO+IPI showed improved OS compared with DAB+TRAM (HR = 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.73), ENCO+BINI (HR = 0.60; CI, 0.42-0.85), and VEM+COBI (HR = 0.50; CI, 0.36-0.70) for the overall study period. In the time-varying analysis, NIVO+IPI was associated with significant improvements in OS and PFS compared with the BRAF/MEK inhibitors 12 months after treatment initiation. There were no significant differences between NIVO+IPI and BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment from 0 to 12 months. Safety outcomes favored DAB+TRAM over NIVO+IPI, whereas NIVO+IPI was comparable to VEM+COBI. CONCLUSION: Results of this MAIC demonstrated durable OS and PFS benefits for patients with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma treated with NIVO+IPI compared with BRAF/MEK inhibitors, with the greatest benefits noted after 12 months.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent100050 -
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIERen_US
dc.relation.ispartofESMO Open
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectBRAF/MEK inhibitors
dc.subjectadvanced melanoma
dc.subjectipilimumab
dc.subjectmatching-adjusted indirect comparison
dc.subjectnivolumab
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIpilimumab
dc.subjectMelanoma
dc.subjectMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases
dc.subjectNivolumab
dc.subjectProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
dc.titleA matching-adjusted indirect comparison of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab with BRAF plus MEK inhibitors for the treatment of BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma☆.en_US
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-01-05
dc.date.updated2022-08-19T12:01:57Z
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100050en_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-02-06
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33556898
pubs.issue2
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Melanoma and Kidney Cancer
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Melanoma and Kidney Cancer/Melanoma and Kidney Cancer (hon.)
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume6
dc.contributor.icrauthorLarkin, James
icr.provenanceDeposited by Mr Arek Surman (impersonating Prof James Larkin) on 2022-08-19. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab with BRAF plus MEK inhibitors for the treat.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/