Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLove, SB
dc.contributor.authorCafferty, F
dc.contributor.authorSnowdon, C
dc.contributor.authorCarty, K
dc.contributor.authorSavage, J
dc.contributor.authorPallmann, P
dc.contributor.authorMcParland, L
dc.contributor.authorBrown, L
dc.contributor.authorMasters, L
dc.contributor.authorSchiavone, F
dc.contributor.authorHague, D
dc.contributor.authorTownsend, S
dc.contributor.authorAmos, C
dc.contributor.authorSouth, A
dc.contributor.authorSturgeon, K
dc.contributor.authorLangley, R
dc.contributor.authorMaughan, T
dc.contributor.authorJames, N
dc.contributor.authorHall, E
dc.contributor.authorKernaghan, S
dc.contributor.authorBliss, J
dc.contributor.authorTurner, N
dc.contributor.authorTutt, A
dc.contributor.authorYap, C
dc.contributor.authorFirth, C
dc.contributor.authorKong, A
dc.contributor.authorMehanna, H
dc.contributor.authorWatts, C
dc.contributor.authorHills, R
dc.contributor.authorThomas, I
dc.contributor.authorCopland, M
dc.contributor.authorBell, S
dc.contributor.authorSebag-Montefiore, D
dc.contributor.authorJones, R
dc.contributor.authorParmar, MKB
dc.contributor.authorSydes, MR
dc.coverage.spatialEngland
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-10T10:28:42Z
dc.date.available2022-10-10T10:28:42Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-06
dc.identifierARTN 757
dc.identifier10.1186/s13063-022-06680-4
dc.identifier.citationTrials, 2022, 23 (1), pp. 757 -
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/5528
dc.identifier.eissn1745-6215
dc.identifier.eissn1745-6215
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13063-022-06680-4
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Late-phase platform protocols (including basket, umbrella, multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS), and master protocols) are generally agreed to be more efficient than traditional two-arm clinical trial designs but are not extensively used. We have gathered the experience of running a number of successful platform protocols together to present some operational recommendations. METHODS: Representatives of six UK clinical trials units with experience in running late-phase platform protocols attended a 1-day meeting structured to discuss various practical aspects of running these trials. We report and give guidance on operational aspects which are either harder to implement compared to a traditional late-phase trial or are specific to platform protocols. RESULTS: We present a list of practical recommendations for trialists intending to design and conduct late-phase platform protocols. Our recommendations cover the entire life cycle of a platform trial: from protocol development, obtaining funding, and trial set-up, to a wide range of operational and regulatory aspects such as staffing, oversight, data handling, and data management, to the reporting of results, with a particular focus on communication with trial participants and stakeholders as well as public and patient involvement. DISCUSSION: Platform protocols enable many questions to be answered efficiently to the benefit of patients. Our practical lessons from running platform trials will support trial teams in learning how to run these trials more effectively and efficiently.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extent757 -
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMC
dc.relation.ispartofTrials
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.subjectBasket trials
dc.subjectComplex innovative designs
dc.subjectMethodology
dc.subjectMulti-arm multi-stage trials
dc.subjectPlatform protocols
dc.subjectStratified medicine
dc.subjectTrial conduct
dc.subjectUmbrella trials
dc.subjectData Management
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectResearch Design
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom
dc.titlePractical guidance for running late-phase platform protocols for clinical trials: lessons from experienced UK clinical trials units.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-08-20
dc.date.updated2022-10-07T14:55:47Z
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s13063-022-06680-4
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-09-06
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068599
pubs.issue1
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.publication-statusPublished online
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06680-4
pubs.volume23
icr.researchteamClin Trials & Stats Unit
dc.contributor.icrauthorCafferty, Fay Helen
dc.contributor.icrauthorJames, Nicholas
dc.contributor.icrauthorHall, Emma
dc.contributor.icrauthorBliss, Judith
dc.contributor.icrauthorTutt, Andrew
dc.contributor.icrauthorYap, Christina
icr.provenanceDeposited by Prof Christina Yap on 2022-10-07. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: Practical guidance for running late-phase platform protocols for clinical trials lessons from experienced UK clinical trials.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/