Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHeer, R
dc.contributor.authorLewis, R
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, A
dc.contributor.authorPenegar, S
dc.contributor.authorVadiveloo, T
dc.contributor.authorClark, E
dc.contributor.authorYu, G
dc.contributor.authorMariappan, P
dc.contributor.authorCresswell, J
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, J
dc.contributor.authorN'Dow, J
dc.contributor.authorNabi, G
dc.contributor.authorMostafid, H
dc.contributor.authorKelly, J
dc.contributor.authorRamsay, C
dc.contributor.authorLazarowicz, H
dc.contributor.authorAllan, A
dc.contributor.authorBreckons, M
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, K
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, L
dc.contributor.authorFeber, A
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, A
dc.contributor.authorNorrie, J
dc.contributor.authorOrozco-Leal, G
dc.contributor.authorRice, S
dc.contributor.authorTandogdu, Z
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, E
dc.contributor.authorWilson, L
dc.contributor.authorVale, L
dc.contributor.authorMacLennan, G
dc.contributor.authorHall, E
dc.coverage.spatialEngland
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-25T09:10:40Z
dc.date.available2022-11-25T09:10:40Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-01
dc.identifier.citationHealth Technology Assessment, 2022, 26 (40), pp. 1 - 144en_US
dc.identifier.issn1366-5278
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/5572
dc.identifier.eissn2046-4924
dc.identifier.eissn2046-4924
dc.identifier.doi10.3310/PLPU1526
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Around 7500 people are diagnosed with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the UK annually. Recurrence following transurethral resection of bladder tumour is common, and the intensive monitoring schedule required after initial treatment has associated costs for patients and the NHS. In photodynamic diagnosis, before transurethral resection of bladder tumour, a photosensitiser that is preferentially absorbed by tumour cells is instilled intravesically. Transurethral resection of bladder tumour is then conducted under blue light, causing the photosensitiser to fluoresce. Photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour offers better diagnostic accuracy than standard white-light-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour, potentially reducing the chance of subsequent recurrence. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour. DESIGN: This was a multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, parallel-group, non-masked, superiority randomised controlled trial. Allocation was by remote web-based service, using a 1 : 1 ratio and a minimisation algorithm balanced by centre and sex. SETTING: The setting was 22 NHS hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥ 16 years with a suspected first diagnosis of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, no contraindications to photodynamic diagnosis and written informed consent were eligible. INTERVENTIONS: Photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour and standard white-light cystoscopy transurethral resection of bladder tumour. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary clinical outcome measure was the time to recurrence from the date of randomisation to the date of pathologically proven first recurrence (or intercurrent bladder cancer death). The primary health economic outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained at 3 years. RESULTS: We enrolled 538 participants from 22 UK hospitals between 11 November 2014 and 6 February 2018. Of these, 269 were allocated to photodynamic diagnosis and 269 were allocated to white light. A total of 112 participants were excluded from the analysis because of ineligibility (n = 5), lack of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer diagnosis following transurethral resection of bladder tumour (n = 89) or early cystectomy (n = 18). In total, 209 photodynamic diagnosis and 217 white-light participants were included in the clinical end-point analysis population. All randomised participants were included in the cost-effectiveness analysis. Over a median follow-up period of 21 months for the photodynamic diagnosis group and 22 months for the white-light group, there were 86 recurrences (3-year recurrence-free survival rate 57.8%, 95% confidence interval 50.7% to 64.2%) in the photodynamic diagnosis group and 84 recurrences (3-year recurrence-free survival rate 61.6%, 95% confidence interval 54.7% to 67.8%) in the white-light group (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.28; p = 0.70). Adverse event frequency was low and similar in both groups [12 (5.7%) in the photodynamic diagnosis group vs. 12 (5.5%) in the white-light group]. At 3 years, the total cost was £12,881 for photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour and £12,005 for white light. There was no evidence of differences in the use of health services or total cost at 3 years. At 3 years, the quality-adjusted life-years gain was 2.094 in the photodynamic diagnosis transurethral resection of bladder tumour group and 2.087 in the white light group. The probability that photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour was cost-effective was never > 30% over the range of society's cost-effectiveness thresholds. LIMITATIONS: Fewer patients than anticipated were correctly diagnosed with intermediate- to high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer before transurethral resection of bladder tumour and the ratio of intermediate- to high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer was higher than expected, reducing the number of observed recurrences and the statistical power. CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour did not reduce recurrences, nor was it likely to be cost-effective compared with white light at 3 years. Photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not supported in the management of primary intermediate- to high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. FUTURE WORK: Further work should include the modelling of appropriate surveillance schedules and exploring predictive and prognostic biomarkers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered as ISRCTN84013636. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research ( NIHR ) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 40. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
dc.formatPrint
dc.format.extent1 - 144
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNIHR JOURNALS LIBRARYen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHealth Technology Assessment
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectBLADDER CANCER
dc.subjectNON-MUSCLE-INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER
dc.subjectPHASE III: TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION
dc.subjectPHOTODYNAMIC DETECTION
dc.subjectRANDOMISED TRIAL
dc.subjectSURGERY
dc.subjectTRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF BLADDER TUMOUR
dc.subjectURINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectBiomarkers
dc.subjectCost-Benefit Analysis
dc.subjectQuality of Life
dc.subjectQuality-Adjusted Life Years
dc.subjectTechnology Assessment, Biomedical
dc.subjectUrinary Bladder Neoplasms
dc.subjectLight
dc.subjectPhotochemotherapy
dc.titlePhotodynamic versus white-light-guided resection of first-diagnosis non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: PHOTO RCT.en_US
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-10-01
dc.date.updated2022-11-24T14:47:05Z
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3310/PLPU1526en_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-10-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300825
pubs.issue40
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3310/plpu1526
pubs.volume26
icr.researchteamClin Trials & Stats Uniten_US
dc.contributor.icrauthorLewis, Rebecca
dc.contributor.icrauthorPenegar, Steven
dc.contributor.icrauthorHall, Emma
icr.provenanceDeposited by Mrs Jessica Perry (impersonating Prof Emma Hall) on 2022-11-24. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: Photodynamic versus white-light-guided resection of first-diagnosis non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; PHOTO RCT.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/