Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFaron, M
dc.contributor.authorCheugoua-Zanetsie, M
dc.contributor.authorTierney, J
dc.contributor.authorThirion, P
dc.contributor.authorNankivell, M
dc.contributor.authorWinter, K
dc.contributor.authorYang, H
dc.contributor.authorShapiro, J
dc.contributor.authorVernerey, D
dc.contributor.authorSmithers, BM
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, T
dc.contributor.authorPiessen, G
dc.contributor.authorNilsson, M
dc.contributor.authorBoonstra, J
dc.contributor.authorYchou, M
dc.contributor.authorLaw, S
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, D
dc.contributor.authorde Vathaire, F
dc.contributor.authorStahl, M
dc.contributor.authorUrba, S
dc.contributor.authorValmasoni, M
dc.contributor.authorWilliaume, D
dc.contributor.authorThomas, J
dc.contributor.authorLordick, F
dc.contributor.authorTepper, J
dc.contributor.authorRoth, J
dc.contributor.authorGebski, V
dc.contributor.authorBurmeister, B
dc.contributor.authorPaoletti, X
dc.contributor.authorvan Sandick, J
dc.contributor.authorFu, J
dc.contributor.authorPignon, J-P
dc.contributor.authorDucreux, M
dc.contributor.authorMichiels, S
dc.contributor.authorMANATEC-02 Collaborative Group
dc.coverage.spatialUnited States
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-29T11:46:38Z
dc.date.available2023-09-29T11:46:38Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-12
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2023, 41 (28), pp. JCO2202279 -en_US
dc.identifier.issn0732-183X
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/5999
dc.identifier.eissn1527-7755
dc.identifier.eissn1527-7755
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.22.02279
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: The optimal neoadjuvant treatment for resectable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (TE) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) remains a matter of debate. We performed an individual participant data (IPD) network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to study the effect of chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, with a focus on tumor location and histology subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All, published or unpublished, RCTs closed to accrual before December 31, 2015 and having compared at least two of the following strategies were eligible: upfront surgery (S), chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS), and chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRS). All analyses were conducted on IPD obtained from investigators. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The IPD-NMA was analyzed by a one-step mixed-effect Cox model adjusted for age, sex, tumor location, and histology. The NMA was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018107158). RESULTS: IPD were obtained for 26 of 35 RCTs (4,985 of 5,807 patients) corresponding to 12 comparisons for CS-S, 12 for CRS-S, and four for CRS-CS. CS and CRS led to increased OS when compared with S with hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86 (0.75 to 0.99), P = .03 and HR = 0.77 (0.68 to 0.87), P < .001 respectively. The NMA comparison of CRS versus CS for OS gave a HR of 0.90 (0.74 to 1.09), P = .27 (consistency P = .26, heterogeneity P = .0038). For CS versus S, a larger effect on OS was observed for GEJ versus TE tumors (P = .036). For the CRS versus S and CRS versus CS, a larger effect on OS was observed for women (P = .003, .012, respectively). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy were consistently better than S alone across histology, but with some variation in the magnitude of treatment effect by sex for CRS and tumor location for CS. A strong OS difference between CS and CRS was not identified.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extentJCO2202279 -
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Oncology
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectMANATEC-02 Collaborative Group
dc.titleIndividual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Carcinoma.en_US
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-04-24
dc.date.updated2023-09-29T11:45:55Z
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1200/JCO.22.02279en_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-07-12
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37467395
pubs.issue28
pubs.organisational-groupICR
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Medicine (RMH Smith Cunningham)
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Medicine (RMH Smith Cunningham)/Medicine (RMH Smith Cunningham) (hon.)
pubs.publication-statusPublished online
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.22.02279
pubs.volume41
icr.researchteamMedicine (RMH)en_US
dc.contributor.icrauthorCunningham, David
icr.provenanceDeposited by Mr Arek Surman on 2023-09-29. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: faron-et-al-2023-individual-participant-data-network-meta-analysis-of-neoadjuvant-chemotherapy-or-chemoradiotherapy-in.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/