Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcNamara, MG
dc.contributor.authorBridgewater, J
dc.contributor.authorLopes, A
dc.contributor.authorWasan, H
dc.contributor.authorMalka, D
dc.contributor.authorJensen, LH
dc.contributor.authorOkusaka, T
dc.contributor.authorKnox, JJ
dc.contributor.authorWagner, D
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, D
dc.contributor.authorShannon, J
dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, D
dc.contributor.authorMoehler, M
dc.contributor.authorBekaii-Saab, T
dc.contributor.authorValle, JW
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-19T11:56:45Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-12
dc.identifier.citationBMC cancer, 2017, 17 (1), pp. 262 - ?
dc.identifier.issn1471-2407
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/712
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2407
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12885-017-3266-9
dc.description.abstractBackground Outcomes in younger (<40 years) and elderly (≥70 years) patients with advanced biliary cancer (ABC) receiving palliative chemotherapy are unclear. This study assessed outcomes in those receiving monotherapy or combination therapy in thirteen prospective systemic-therapy trials.Methods Multivariable analysis explored the impact of therapy on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in two separate age cohort groups: <70 years and ≥70 years, and <40 years and ≥40 years.Results Overall, 1163 patients were recruited (Jan 1997-Dec 2013). Median age of entire cohort: 63 years (range 23-85); 36 (3%) were <40, 260 (22%); ≥70. Combination therapy was platinum-based in nine studies. Among patients <40 and ≥70 years, 23 (64%) and 182 (70%) received combination therapy, respectively. Median follow-up was 42 months (95%-CI 37-51). Median PFS for patients <40 and ≥40 years was 3.5 and 5.9 months (P = 0.12), and OS was 10.8 and 9.7 months, respectively (P = 0.55). Median PFS for those <70 and ≥70 years was 6.0 and 5.0 months (P = 0.53), and OS was 10.2 and 8.8 months, respectively (P = 0.08). For the entire cohort, PFS and OS were significantly better in those receiving combination therapy: Hazard Ratio [HR]-0.66, 95%-CI 0.58-0.76, P < 0.0001 and HR-0.72, 95%-CI 0.63-0.82, P < 0.0001, respectively; and in patients ≥70 years: HR-0.54 (95%-CI 0.38-0.77, P = 0.001) and HR-0.60 (95%-CI 0.43-0.85, P = 0.004), respectively. There was no evidence of interaction between age and treatment for PFS (P = 0.58, P = 0.66) or OS (P = 0.18, P = 0.75).Conclusions In ABC, younger patients are rare, and survival in elderly patients in receipt of systemic therapy for advanced disease, whether monotherapy or combination therapy, is similar to that of non-elderly patients, therefore age alone should not influence decisions regarding treatment.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extent262 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectBiliary Tract Neoplasms
dc.subjectCisplatin
dc.subjectCarboplatin
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subjectDisease-Free Survival
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectSurvival Analysis
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.titleSystemic therapy in younger and elderly patients with advanced biliary cancer: sub-analysis of ABC-02 and twelve other prospective trials.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-04-05
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s12885-017-3266-9
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-04-12
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfBMC cancer
pubs.issue1
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Medicine (RMH Smith Cunningham)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Medicine (RMH Smith Cunningham)/Medicine (RMH Smith Cunningham) (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Medicine (RMH Smith Cunningham)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Medicine (RMH Smith Cunningham)/Medicine (RMH Smith Cunningham) (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume17
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamMedicine (RMH Smith Cunningham)en_US
dc.contributor.icrauthorCunningham, David
dc.contributor.icrauthorMarsden,


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0