Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYang, JC-H
dc.contributor.authorOu, S-HI
dc.contributor.authorDe Petris, L
dc.contributor.authorGadgeel, S
dc.contributor.authorGandhi, L
dc.contributor.authorKim, D-W
dc.contributor.authorBarlesi, F
dc.contributor.authorGovindan, R
dc.contributor.authorDingemans, A-MC
dc.contributor.authorCrino, L
dc.contributor.authorLena, H
dc.contributor.authorPopat, S
dc.contributor.authorAhn, JS
dc.contributor.authorDansin, E
dc.contributor.authorGolding, S
dc.contributor.authorBordogna, W
dc.contributor.authorBalas, B
dc.contributor.authorMorcos, PN
dc.contributor.authorZeaiter, A
dc.contributor.authorShaw, AT
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-20T13:56:46Z
dc.date.issued2017-10
dc.identifier.citationJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2017, 12 (10), pp. 1552 - 1560
dc.identifier.issn1556-0864
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/738
dc.identifier.eissn1556-1380
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtho.2017.06.070
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Alectinib demonstrated clinical efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in two phase II studies (NP28761 and NP28673). Here we report the pooled efficacy and safety data after 15 and 18 months more follow-up than in the respective primary analyses.Methods Enrolled patients had ALK receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK)-positive NSCLC and had progressed while taking, or could not tolerate, crizotinib. Patients received oral alectinib, 600 mg twice daily. The primary end point in both studies was objective response rate assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary end points included disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety.Results The pooled data set included 225 patients (n = 138 in NP28673 and n = 87 in NP28761). The response-evaluable population included 189 patients (84% [n = 122 in NP28673 and n = 67 in NP28761]). In the response-evaluable population, objective response rate as assessed by the IRC was 51.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44.0-58.6 [all PRs]), the disease control rate was 78.8% (95% CI: 72.3-84.4), and the median duration of response was 14.9 months (95% CI: 11.1-20.4) after 58% of events. Median progression-free survival as assessed by the IRC was 8.3 months (95% CI: 7.0-11.3) and median overall survival was 26.0 months (95% CI: 21.4-not estimable). Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) occurred in 40% of patients, 6% of patients had treatment withdrawn on account of AEs, and 33% had AEs leading to dose interruptions/modification.Conclusions This pooled data analysis confirmed the robust systemic efficacy of alectinib in ALK-positive NSCLC with a durable response rate. Alectinib also had an acceptable safety profile with a longer duration of follow-up.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent1552 - 1560
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
dc.subjectLung Neoplasms
dc.subjectPiperidines
dc.subjectCarbazoles
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectMale
dc.titlePooled Systemic Efficacy and Safety Data from the Pivotal Phase II Studies (NP28673 and NP28761) of Alectinib in ALK-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-06-29
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.jtho.2017.06.070
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-10
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
pubs.issue10
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Thoracic Oncology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Thoracic Oncology/Thoracic Oncology (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Thoracic Oncology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Thoracic Oncology/Thoracic Oncology (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume12
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamThoracic Oncologyen_US
dc.contributor.icrauthorPopat, Sanjay
dc.contributor.icrauthorMarsden,


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0