Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTokaca, N
dc.contributor.authorBarth, S
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, M
dc.contributor.authorBhosle, J
dc.contributor.authorFotiadis, N
dc.contributor.authorWotherspoon, A
dc.contributor.authorThompson, L
dc.contributor.authorPopat, S
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-24T10:35:42Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.identifier.citationJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2018, 13 (1), pp. 63 - 72
dc.identifier.issn1556-0864
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/867
dc.identifier.eissn1556-1380
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtho.2017.09.1958
dc.description.abstractIntroduction In the era of biomarker-driven systemic therapy for advanced NSCLC, the role of routine repeated biopsies for decision making outside EGFR-mutant disease remains unproven. We report our center's experience of safety and adequacy for molecular retesting of tumor material obtained from image-guided lung rebiopsies in NSCLC.Methods We performed a retrospective case note analysis of patients undergoing image-guided lung rebiopsies at a single cancer center between 2011 and 2014. The primary objective was to determine the pathological success rate. Secondary and exploratory objectives were to determine technical success rate, histological concordance, molecular adequacy, genotypes identified, and complication rate.Results In all, 103 patients underwent transthoracic image-guided procedures. A total of 66 rebiopsies in NSCLC were identified and analyzed. The pathological success rate was 87.1%. A high histological discordance rate was observed (12 of 52 evaluable cases [23.1%]). Pretest molecular adequacy as determined by the lung pathologist was 78.8% (52 of 66). Of 52 adequate samples 51 were sent for molecular analysis, with a total of 209 genes analyzed (including EGFR, ALK receptor tyrosine kinase gene [ALK], KRAS, BRAF, dicoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 2 gene [DDR2], NRAS, ROS1, and rearranged during transfection proto-oncogene gene [RET]). The rate of postgenotyping molecular adequacy was 87.1% (182 of 209). Overall, 20 new potentially actionable mutations were identified, with 13 of 66 patients (19.7%) starting to receive new targeted treatment as a result. Overall, rebiopsies informed clinical decision making in 63.6% of cases. The rates of complications were 15% for pneumothorax, 3% for pneumothorax requiring chest drain, and 8% for hemoptysis.Conclusions We have validated the pathological and molecular adequacy rates of rebiopsies and demonstrated clinical utility in routine decision making.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent63 - 72
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectAdenocarcinoma
dc.subjectCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
dc.subjectCarcinoma, Squamous Cell
dc.subjectLung Neoplasms
dc.subjectPrognosis
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studies
dc.subjectMutation
dc.subjectDecision Support Techniques
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectImage-Guided Biopsy
dc.subjectErbB Receptors
dc.titleMolecular Adequacy of Image-Guided Rebiopsies for Molecular Retesting in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Experience.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-22
rioxxterms.funderThe Institute of Cancer Research
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUnspecified
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.jtho.2017.09.1958
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
pubs.issue1
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Thoracic Oncology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Thoracic Oncology/Thoracic Oncology (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Treatment of thoracic tumours
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Treatment of thoracic tumours/Treatment of thoracic tumours (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Thoracic Oncology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Thoracic Oncology/Thoracic Oncology (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Treatment of thoracic tumours
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Treatment of thoracic tumours/Treatment of thoracic tumours (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume13
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamThoracic Oncologyen_US
icr.researchteamTreatment of thoracic tumoursen_US
dc.contributor.icrauthorPopat, Sanjayen
dc.contributor.icrauthorO'Brien, Maryen
dc.contributor.icrauthorMarsden,en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record