Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTurner, NC
dc.contributor.authorFinn, RS
dc.contributor.authorMartin, M
dc.contributor.authorIm, S-A
dc.contributor.authorDeMichele, A
dc.contributor.authorEttl, J
dc.contributor.authorDiéras, V
dc.contributor.authorMoulder, S
dc.contributor.authorLipatov, O
dc.contributor.authorColleoni, M
dc.contributor.authorCristofanilli, M
dc.contributor.authorLu, DR
dc.contributor.authorMori, A
dc.contributor.authorGiorgetti, C
dc.contributor.authorIyer, S
dc.contributor.authorBartlett, CH
dc.contributor.authorGelmon, KA
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-05T13:23:28Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-01
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018, 29 (3), pp. 669 - 680
dc.identifier.issn0923-7534
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/2002
dc.identifier.eissn1569-8041
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/annonc/mdx797
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: This report assesses the efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) in women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) with or without visceral metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pre- and postmenopausal women with disease progression following prior ET (PALOMA-3; N = 521) and postmenopausal women untreated for ABC (PALOMA-2; N = 666) were randomized 2 : 1 to ET (fulvestrant or letrozole, respectively) plus palbociclib or placebo. Progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and patient-reported quality of life (QoL) were evaluated by prior treatment and visceral involvement. RESULTS: Visceral metastases incidence was higher in patients with prior resistance to ET (58.3%, PALOMA-3) than in patients naive to ET in the ABC setting (48.6%, PALOMA-2). In patients with prior resistance to ET and visceral metastases, median PFS (mPFS) was 9.2 months with palbociclib plus fulvestrant versus 3.4 months with placebo plus fulvestrant [hazard ratio (HR), 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.35-0.61], and objective response rate (ORR) was 28.0% versus 6.7%, respectively. In patients with nonvisceral metastases, mPFS was 16.6 versus 7.3 months, HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.36-0.77. In patients with visceral disease and naive to ET in the advanced disease setting, mPFS was 19.3 months with palbociclib plus letrozole versus 12.9 months with placebo plus letrozole (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.85); ORR was 55.1% versus 40.0%; in patients with nonvisceral disease, mPFS was not reached with palbociclib plus letrozole versus 16.8 months with placebo plus letrozole (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.36-0.70). In patients with prior resistance to ET with visceral metastases, palbociclib plus fulvestrant significantly delayed deterioration of QoL versus placebo plus fulvestrant, whereas patient-reported QoL was maintained with palbociclib plus letrozole in patients naive to endocrine-based therapy for ABC. CONCLUSIONS: Palbociclib plus ET prolonged mPFS in patients with visceral metastases, increased ORRs, and in patients previously treated for ABC, delayed QoL deterioration, presenting a standard treatment option among patients with visceral metastases amenable to endocrine-based therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01942135, NCT01740427.
dc.formatPrint
dc.format.extent669 - 680
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOXFORD UNIV PRESS
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectViscera
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectNeoplasm Metastasis
dc.subjectPiperazines
dc.subjectPyridines
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subjectQuality of Life
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFulvestrant
dc.subjectLetrozole
dc.subjectProgression-Free Survival
dc.titleClinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-02-14
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/annonc/mdx797
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-03
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
pubs.issue3
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research/Molecular Oncology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research/Molecular Oncology
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume29
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamMolecular Oncology
dc.contributor.icrauthorTurner, Nicholas


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0