Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWinfield, JM
dc.contributor.authorOrton, MR
dc.contributor.authorCollins, DJ
dc.contributor.authorInd, TEJ
dc.contributor.authorAttygalle, A
dc.contributor.authorHazell, S
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, VA
dc.contributor.authordeSouza, NM
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-23T10:40:48Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-01
dc.identifier.citationEuropean radiology, 2017, 27 (2), pp. 627 - 636
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/226
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1084
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-016-4417-0
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Assessment of empirical diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) models in cervical tumours to investigate whether fitted parameters distinguish between types and grades of tumours. METHODS: Forty-two patients (24 squamous cell carcinomas, 14 well/moderately differentiated, 10 poorly differentiated; 15 adenocarcinomas, 13 well/moderately differentiated, two poorly differentiated; three rare types) were imaged at 3 T using nine b-values (0 to 800 s mm-2). Mono-exponential, stretched exponential, kurtosis, statistical, and bi-exponential models were fitted. Model preference was assessed using Bayesian Information Criterion analysis. Differences in fitted parameters between tumour types/grades and correlation between fitted parameters were assessed using two-way analysis of variance and Pearson's linear correlation coefficient, respectively. RESULTS: Non-mono-exponential models were preferred by 83 % of tumours with bi-exponential and stretched exponential models preferred by the largest numbers of tumours. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and diffusion coefficients from non-mono-exponential models were significantly lower in poorly differentiated tumours than well/moderately differentiated tumours. α (stretched exponential), K (kurtosis), f and D* (bi-exponential) were significantly different between tumour types. Strong correlation was observed between ADC and diffusion coefficients from other models. CONCLUSIONS: Non-mono-exponential models were preferred to the mono-exponential model in DW-MRI data from cervical tumours. Parameters of non-mono-exponential models showed significant differences between types and grades of tumours. KEY POINTS: • Non-mono-exponential DW-MRI models are preferred in the majority of cervical tumours. • Poorly differentiated cervical tumours exhibit lower diffusion coefficients than well/moderately differentiated tumours. • Non-mono-exponential model parameters α, K, f, and D* differ between tumour types. • Micro-structural features are likely to affect parameters in non-mono-exponential models differently.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent627 - 636
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectCervix Uteri
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectAdenocarcinoma
dc.subjectCarcinoma, Squamous Cell
dc.subjectDiffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectBayes Theorem
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectModels, Theoretical
dc.subjectUterine Cervical Neoplasms
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectNeoplasm Grading
dc.titleSeparation of type and grade in cervical tumours using non-mono-exponential models of diffusion-weighted MRI.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-05-13
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s00330-016-4417-0
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfEuropean radiology
pubs.issue2
pubs.notesNo embargo
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume27
pubs.embargo.termsNo embargo
icr.researchteamMagnetic Resonance
dc.contributor.icrauthorCollins, David
dc.contributor.icrauthordeSouza, Nandita


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0