Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorO'Connell, RL
dc.contributor.authorDi Micco, R
dc.contributor.authorKhabra, K
dc.contributor.authorKirby, AM
dc.contributor.authorHarris, PA
dc.contributor.authorJames, SE
dc.contributor.authorPower, K
dc.contributor.authorRamsey, KWD
dc.contributor.authorRusby, JE
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-14T09:00:50Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.identifier.citationPlastic and reconstructive surgery, 2018, 142 (3), pp. 594 - 605
dc.identifier.issn0032-1052
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/2921
dc.identifier.eissn1529-4242
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/prs.0000000000004676
dc.description.abstractBackground The authors investigated aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction in women who have undergone deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction in the setting of postmastectomy radiotherapy. Patients who underwent DIEP flap reconstruction without postmastectomy radiotherapy were the control group.Methods Participants who had undergone DIEP flap reconstruction between September 1, 2009, and September 1, 2014, were recruited, answered the BREAST-Q, and underwent three-dimensional surface-imaging. A panel assessed the aesthetic outcome by reviewing these images.Results One hundred sixty-seven women participated. Eighty women (48 percent) underwent immediate DIEP flap reconstruction and no postmastectomy radiotherapy; 28 (17 percent) underwent immediate DIEP flap reconstruction with postmastectomy radiotherapy; 38 (23 percent) underwent simple mastectomy, postmastectomy radiotherapy, and DIEP flap reconstruction; and 21 (13 percent) underwent mastectomy with temporizing implant, postmastectomy radiotherapy, and DIEP flap reconstruction. Median satisfaction scores were significantly different among the groups (p < 0.05). Post hoc comparison demonstrated that women who had an immediate DIEP flap reconstruction were significantly less satisfied if they had postmastectomy radiotherapy. In women requiring radiotherapy, those undergoing delayed reconstruction after a simple mastectomy were most satisfied, but there was no significant difference between the immediate DIEP flap and temporizing implant groups. Median panel scores differed among groups, being significantly higher if the immediate reconstruction was not subjected to radiotherapy. There was no significant difference in panel assessment among the three groups of women who had received radiotherapy.Conclusions Patients who avoid having their immediate DIEP flap reconstruction irradiated are more satisfied and have better aesthetic outcome than those who undergo postmastectomy radiotherapy. In women requiring radiotherapy and who wish to have an immediate or "delayed-immediate" reconstruction, there were no significant differences in panel or patient satisfaction. Therefore, immediate DIEP flap reconstruction or mastectomy with temporizing implant then DIEP flap surgery are acceptable treatment pathways in the context of post-mastectomy radiotherapy.
dc.formatPrint
dc.format.extent594 - 605
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectEpigastric Arteries
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectRadiotherapy, Adjuvant
dc.subjectMammaplasty
dc.subjectMastectomy
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectEsthetics
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPatient Satisfaction
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectPerforator Flap
dc.subjectPatient Reported Outcome Measures
dc.titleComparison of Immediate versus Delayed DIEP Flap Reconstruction in Women Who Require Postmastectomy Radiotherapy.
dc.typeJournal Article
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1097/prs.0000000000004676
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-09
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfPlastic and reconstructive surgery
pubs.issue3
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume142
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamBreast Cancer Radiotherapy
dc.contributor.icrauthorKirby, Anna
dc.contributor.icrauthorRusby, Jennifer


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0