Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMenten, MJ
dc.contributor.authorFast, MF
dc.contributor.authorWetscherek, A
dc.contributor.authorRank, CM
dc.contributor.authorKachelrieß, M
dc.contributor.authorCollins, DJ
dc.contributor.authorNill, S
dc.contributor.authorOelfke, U
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-17T11:29:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-28T11:46:36Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-22
dc.identifier.citationPhysics in medicine and biology, 2018, 63 (23), pp. 235005 - ?
dc.identifier.issn0031-9155
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/3108
dc.identifier.eissn1361-6560
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1361-6560/aae74d
dc.description.abstract2D cine MR imaging may be utilized to monitor rapidly moving tumors and organs-at-risk for real-time adaptive radiotherapy. This study systematically investigates the impact of geometric imaging parameters on the ability of 2D cine MR imaging to guide template-matching-driven autocontouring of lung tumors and abdominal organs. Abdominal 4D MR images were acquired of six healthy volunteers and thoracic 4D MR images were obtained of eight lung cancer patients. At each breathing phase of the images, the left kidney and gallbladder or lung tumor, respectively, were outlined as volumes of interest. These images and contours were used to create artificial 2D cine MR images, while simultaneously serving as 3D ground truth. We explored the impact of five different imaging parameters (pixel size, slice thickness, imaging plane orientation, number and relative alignment of images as well as strategies to create training images). For each possible combination of imaging parameters, we generated artificial 2D cine MR images as training and test images. A template-matching algorithm used the training images to determine the tumor or organ position in the test images. Subsequently, a 3D base contour was shifted to the determined position and compared to the ground truth via centroid distance and Dice similarity coefficient. The median centroid distance between adapted and ground truth contours was 1.56 mm for the kidney, 3.81 mm for the gallbladder and 1.03 mm for the lung tumor (median Dice similarity coefficient: 0.95, 0.72 and 0.93). We observed that a decrease in image resolution led to a modest decrease in localization accuracy, especially for the small gallbladder. However, for all volumes of interest localization accuracy varied substantially more between subjects than due to the different imaging parameters. Automated tumor and organ localization using 2D cine MR imaging and template-matching-based autocontouring is robust against variation of geometric imaging parameters. Future work and optimization efforts of 2D cine MR imaging for real-time adaptive radiotherapy is needed to characterize the influence of sequence- and anatomical site-specific imaging contrast.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extent235005 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIOP PUBLISHING LTD
dc.relation.replaceshttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/2975
dc.relation.replacesinternal/2975
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
dc.subjectAbdominal Neoplasms
dc.subjectLung Neoplasms
dc.subjectKidney Neoplasms
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectCase-Control Studies
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectRespiration
dc.subjectMovement
dc.subjectAlgorithms
dc.subjectRadiotherapy, Image-Guided
dc.titleThe impact of 2D cine MR imaging parameters on automated tumor and organ localization for MR-guided real-time adaptive radiotherapy.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-10-10
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1088/1361-6560/aae74d
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-11-22
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfPhysics in medicine and biology
pubs.issue23
pubs.notesNo embargo
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radiotherapy Physics Modelling
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radiotherapy Physics Modelling
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume63
pubs.embargo.termsNo embargo
icr.researchteamRadiotherapy Physics Modelling
dc.contributor.icrauthorMenten, Martin
dc.contributor.icrauthorWetscherek, Andreas
dc.contributor.icrauthorCollins, David
dc.contributor.icrauthorNill, Simeon


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0