Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCrusz, SM
dc.contributor.authorTang, YZ
dc.contributor.authorSarker, S-J
dc.contributor.authorPrevoo, W
dc.contributor.authorKiyani, I
dc.contributor.authorBeltran, L
dc.contributor.authorPeters, J
dc.contributor.authorSahdev, A
dc.contributor.authorBex, A
dc.contributor.authorPowles, T
dc.contributor.authorGerlinger, M
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-12T10:54:46Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-14
dc.identifier.citationBMC medicine, 2016, 14 (1), pp. 185 - ?
dc.identifier.issn1741-7015
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/318
dc.identifier.eissn1741-7015
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12916-016-0729-9
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Molecular intratumour heterogeneity (ITH) is common in clear cell renal carcinomas (ccRCCs). However, it remains unknown whether this is mirrored by heterogeneity of drug responses between metastases in the same patient. METHODS: We performed a retrospective central radiological analysis of patients with treatment-naïve metastatic ccRCC receiving anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (sunitinib or pazopanib) within three similar phase II trials. Treatment was briefly interrupted for cytoreductive nephrectomy. All patients had multiple metastases that were measured by regular computed tomography scans from baseline until Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST)-defined progression. Each metastasis was categorised as responding, stable or progressing. Patients were classed as having a homogeneous response if all lesions were of the same response category and a heterogeneous response if they differed. RESULTS: A total of 115 metastases were assessed longitudinally in 27 patients. Of these patients, 56% had a heterogeneous response. Progression occurred through the appearance of new metastases in 67%, through progression of existing lesions in 11% and by both in 22% of patients. Despite RECIST-defined progression, 57% of existing metastases remained controlled. The sum of controlled lesions was greater than that of uncontrolled lesions in 47% of patients who progressed only with measurable new lesions. CONCLUSIONS: We identified frequent ITH of anti-angiogenic TKI responses, with subsets of metastases responding and progressing within individual patients. This mirrors molecular ITH and may indicate that anti-angiogenic drug resistance is confined to subclones and not encoded on the trunk of the tumours' phylogenetic trees. This is clinically important, as patients with small-volume progression may benefit from drug continuation. Predominant progression with new rather than in existing metastases supports a change in disease biology through anti-angiogenics. The results highlight limitations of RECIST in heterogeneous cancers, which may influence clinical trial data validity. This analysis requires prospective confirmation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Clinical Trials Database(EudraCT): 2009-016675-29 , registered 17 March 2010; EudraCT: 2006-004511-21 , registered 09 March 2007; EudraCT: 2006-006491-38 , registered 22 December 2006.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extent185 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBIOMED CENTRAL LTD
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectCarcinoma, Renal Cell
dc.subjectKidney Neoplasms
dc.subjectNeoplasm Metastasis
dc.subjectDisease Progression
dc.subjectProtein Kinase Inhibitors
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectMale
dc.titleHeterogeneous response and progression patterns reveal phenotypic heterogeneity of tyrosine kinase inhibitor response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-10-26
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s12916-016-0729-9
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-11-14
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfBMC medicine
pubs.issue1
pubs.notesNo embargo
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Molecular Pathology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Molecular Pathology/Translational Oncogenomics
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Molecular Pathology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Molecular Pathology/Translational Oncogenomics
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume14
pubs.embargo.termsNo embargo
icr.researchteamTranslational Oncogenomics
dc.contributor.icrauthorGerlinger, Marco


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0