Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFreedman, JN
dc.contributor.authorBainbridge, HE
dc.contributor.authorNill, S
dc.contributor.authorCollins, DJ
dc.contributor.authorKachelrieß, M
dc.contributor.authorLeach, MO
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, F
dc.contributor.authorOelfke, U
dc.contributor.authorWetscherek, A
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T13:36:33Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-23
dc.identifier.citationPhysics in medicine and biology, 2019, 64 (11), pp. 115005 - ?
dc.identifier.issn0031-9155
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/3222
dc.identifier.eissn1361-6560
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1361-6560/ab0dbb
dc.description.abstractMR-guided radiotherapy treatment planning utilises the high soft-tissue contrast of MRI to reduce uncertainty in delineation of the target and organs at risk. Replacing 4D-CT with MRI-derived synthetic 4D-CT would support treatment plan adaptation on hybrid MR-guided radiotherapy systems for inter- and intrafractional differences in anatomy and respiration, whilst mitigating the risk of CT to MRI registration errors. Three methods were devised to calculate synthetic 4D and midposition (time-weighted mean position of the respiratory cycle) CT from 4D-T1w and Dixon MRI. The first approach employed intensity-based segmentation of Dixon MRI for bulk-density assignment (sCTD). The second step added spine density information using an atlas of CT and Dixon MRI (sCTDS). The third iteration used a polynomial function relating Hounsfield units and normalised T1w image intensity to account for variable lung density (sCTDSL). Motion information in 4D-T1w MRI was applied to generate synthetic CT in midposition and in twenty respiratory phases. For six lung cancer patients, synthetic 4D-CT was validated against 4D-CT in midposition by comparison of Hounsfield units and dose-volume metrics. Dosimetric differences found by comparing sCTD,DS,DSL and CT were evaluated using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p   =  0.05). Compared to sCTD and sCTDS, planning on sCTDSL significantly reduced absolute dosimetric differences in the planning target volume metrics to less than 98 cGy (1.7% of the prescribed dose) on average. When comparing sCTDSL and CT, average radiodensity differences were within 97 Hounsfield units and dosimetric differences were significant only for the planning target volume D99% metric. All methods produced clinically acceptable results for the organs at risk in accordance with the UK SABR consensus guidelines and the LungTech EORTC phase II trial. The overall good agreement between sCTDSL and CT demonstrates the feasibility of employing synthetic 4D-CT for plan adaptation on hybrid MR-guided radiotherapy systems.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extent115005 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIOP PUBLISHING LTD
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
dc.subjectLung Neoplasms
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectRadiography, Thoracic
dc.subjectRadiosurgery
dc.subjectRadiotherapy Dosage
dc.subjectRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
dc.subjectRespiration
dc.subjectMovement
dc.subjectAlgorithms
dc.subjectFour-Dimensional Computed Tomography
dc.subjectRadiotherapy, Image-Guided
dc.titleSynthetic 4D-CT of the thorax for treatment plan adaptation on MR-guided radiotherapy systems.
dc.typeJournal Article
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1088/1361-6560/ab0dbb
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-05-23
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfPhysics in medicine and biology
pubs.issue11
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radiotherapy Physics Modelling
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radiotherapy Physics Modelling
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume64
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamMagnetic Resonance
icr.researchteamRadiotherapy Physics Modelling
dc.contributor.icrauthorFreedman, Joshua
dc.contributor.icrauthorBainbridge, Hannah
dc.contributor.icrauthorNill, Simeon
dc.contributor.icrauthorCollins, David
dc.contributor.icrauthorLeach, Martin
dc.contributor.icrauthorWetscherek, Andreas


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0