Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWeller, A
dc.contributor.authorDunlop, A
dc.contributor.authorOxer, A
dc.contributor.authorGunapala, R
dc.contributor.authorMurray, I
dc.contributor.authorGray, MJ
dc.contributor.authorFlux, GD
dc.contributor.authordeSouza, NM
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, M
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-11T12:18:31Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-01
dc.identifier.citationThe British journal of radiology, 2019, 92 (1101), pp. 20190184 - ?
dc.identifier.issn0007-1285
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/3725
dc.identifier.eissn1748-880X
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/bjr.20190184
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, to establish whether the fractional volumes of irradiated anatomic or perfused lung differed between those with and without deteriorating lung function or radiation associated lung injury (RALI). METHODS: 48 patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for NSCLC had a radiotherapy-planning CT scan and single photon emission CT lung perfusion imaging (99mTc-labelled macroaggregate albumin). CT defined the anatomic and the single photon emission CT scan (co-registered with CT) identified the perfused (threshold 20 % of maximum) lung volumes. Fractional volumes of anatomic and perfused lung receiving more than 5, 10, 13, 20, 30, 40, 50 Gy were compared between patients with deteriorating (>median decline) vs stable (<median decline) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and between those with and without RALI (assessed by Common Toxic Criteria for Adverse Events) radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis scores. RESULTS: Fractional volumes of anatomic and perfused lung receiving more than 10, 13 and 20 Gy were significantly higher in patients with deteriorating vs stable FEV1 ( p = 0.005, 0.005 and 0.025 respectively) but did not differ for higher doses of radiation (>30, 40, 50 Gy). Fractional volumes of anatomic and perfused lung receiving > 10 Gy best predicted decline in FEV1 (Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (Az = 0.77 and 0.76 respectively); sensitivity/specificity 75%/81 and 80%/71%) for a 32.7% anatomic and 33.5% perfused volume cut-off. Irradiating an anatomic fractional volume of 4.7% to > 50 Gy had a sensitivity/specificity of 83%/89 % for indicating RALI (Az = 0.83). CONCLUSION: A 10-20 Gy radiation dose to anatomic or perfused lung results in decline in FEV1. A fractional anatomic volume of >5% receiving >50 Gy influences development of RALI. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Extent of low-dose radiation to normal lung influences functional respiratory decline.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent20190184 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBRITISH INST RADIOLOGY
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectLung
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
dc.subjectLung Neoplasms
dc.subjectRadiation Injuries
dc.subjectTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computed
dc.subjectRadiotherapy Dosage
dc.subjectRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
dc.subjectPredictive Value of Tests
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectMale
dc.titleSpect perfusion imaging versus CT for predicting radiation injury to normal lung in lung cancer patients.
dc.typeJournal Article
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1259/bjr.20190184
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-09
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfThe British journal of radiology
pubs.issue1101
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Lung Radiotherapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radioisotope Physics
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radioisotope Physics/Radioisotope Physics (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Lung Radiotherapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radioisotope Physics
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radioisotope Physics/Radioisotope Physics (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume92
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamLung Radiotherapy
icr.researchteamMagnetic Resonance
icr.researchteamRadioisotope Physics
dc.contributor.icrauthordeSouza, Nandita


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0