Mechanism for remodelling of the cell cycle checkpoint protein MAD2 by the ATPase TRIP13.
View/ Open
Date
2018-07-12ICR Author
Author
Alfieri, C
Chang, L
Barford, D
Type
Journal Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The maintenance of genome stability during mitosis is coordinated by the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) through its effector the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), an inhibitor of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C, also known as the cyclosome)1,2. Unattached kinetochores control MCC assembly by catalysing a change in the topology of the β-sheet of MAD2 (an MCC subunit), thereby generating the active closed MAD2 (C-MAD2) conformer3-5. Disassembly of free MCC, which is required for SAC inactivation and chromosome segregation, is an ATP-dependent process driven by the AAA+ ATPase TRIP13. In combination with p31comet, an SAC antagonist6, TRIP13 remodels C-MAD2 into inactive open MAD2 (O-MAD2)7-10. Here, we present a mechanism that explains how TRIP13-p31comet disassembles the MCC. Cryo-electron microscopy structures of the TRIP13-p31comet-C-MAD2-CDC20 complex reveal that p31comet recruits C-MAD2 to a defined site on the TRIP13 hexameric ring, positioning the N terminus of C-MAD2 (MAD2NT) to insert into the axial pore of TRIP13 and distorting the TRIP13 ring to initiate remodelling. Molecular modelling suggests that by gripping MAD2NT within its axial pore, TRIP13 couples sequential ATP-driven translocation of its hexameric ring along MAD2NT to push upwards on, and simultaneously rotate, the globular domains of the p31comet-C-MAD2 complex. This unwinds a region of the αA helix of C-MAD2 that is required to stabilize the C-MAD2 β-sheet, thus destabilizing C-MAD2 in favour of O-MAD2 and dissociating MAD2 from p31comet. Our study provides insights into how specific substrates are recruited to AAA+ ATPases through adaptor proteins and suggests a model of how translocation through the axial pore of AAA+ ATPases is coupled to protein remodelling.
Collections
Subject
Humans
Apoproteins
Cell Cycle Proteins
Cryoelectron Microscopy
Binding Sites
Protein Conformation
Substrate Specificity
Models, Molecular
Biocatalysis
M Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints
Mad2 Proteins
Spindle Apparatus
Cdc20 Proteins
ATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular Activities
Research team
Molecular mechanisms of cell cycle regulation
Language
eng
Date accepted
2018-05-16
License start date
2018-07-04
Citation
Nature, 2018, 559 (7713), pp. 274 - 278
Publisher
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Phosphorylation-mediated interactions with TOPBP1 couple 53BP1 and 9-1-1 to control the G1 DNA damage checkpoint.
Bigot, N; Day, M; Baldock, RA; Watts, FZ; Oliver, AW; et al. (ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD, 2019-05-28)Coordination of the cellular response to DNA damage is organised by multi-domain 'scaffold' proteins, including 53BP1 and TOPBP1, which recognise post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, methylation and ... -
Structural Basis for Auto-Inhibition of the NDR1 Kinase Domain by an Atypically Long Activation Segment.
Xiong, S; Lorenzen, K; Couzens, AL; Templeton, CM; Rajendran, D; et al. (CELL PRESS, 2018-08-07)The human NDR family kinases control diverse aspects of cell growth, and are regulated through phosphorylation and association with scaffolds such as MOB1. Here, we report the crystal structure of the human NDR1 kinase ... -
Multiparametric Analysis of Cell Shape Demonstrates that β-PIX Directly Couples YAP Activation to Extracellular Matrix Adhesion.
Sero, JE; Bakal, C (CELL PRESS, 2017-01-25)Mechanical signals from the extracellular matrix (ECM) and cellular geometry regulate the nuclear translocation of transcriptional regulators such as Yes-associated protein (YAP). Elucidating how physical signals control ...