Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, SF
dc.contributor.authorMiloro, P
dc.contributor.authorAxell, R
dc.contributor.authorTer Haar, G
dc.contributor.authorLees, C
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-08T14:45:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-14
dc.identifierhttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000570627300001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=d4b848928d1c3e5c86d298abb68475f9
dc.identifierARTN 1742271X20953197
dc.identifier.citationULTRASOUND, 2020, pp. ? - ? (10)
dc.identifier.issn1742-271X
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4133
dc.identifier.eissn1743-1344
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1742271X20953197
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: The quantification of heating effects during exposure to ultrasound is usually based on laboratory experiments in water and is assessed using extrapolated parameters such as the thermal index. In our study, we have measured the temperature increase directly in a simulator of the maternal-fetal environment, the 'ISUOG Phantom', using clinically relevant ultrasound scanners, transducers and exposure conditions. METHODS: The study was carried out using an instrumented phantom designed to represent the pregnant maternal abdomen and which enabled temperature recordings at positions in tissue mimics which represented the skin surface, sub-surface, amniotic fluid and fetal bone interface. We tested four different transducers on a commercial diagnostic scanner. The effects of scan duration, presence of a circulating fluid, pre-set and power were recorded. RESULTS: The highest temperature increase was always at the transducer-skin interface, where temperature increases between 1.4°C and 9.5°C were observed; lower temperature rises, between 0.1°C and 1.0°C, were observed deeper in tissue and at the bone interface. Doppler modes generated the highest temperature increases. Most of the heating occurred in the first 3 minutes of exposure, with the presence of a circulating fluid having a limited effect. The power setting affected the maximum temperature increase proportionally, with peak temperature increasing from 4.3°C to 6.7°C when power was increased from 63% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Although this phantom provides a crude mimic of the in vivo conditions, the overall results showed good repeatability and agreement with previously published experiments. All studies showed that the temperature rises observed fell within the recommendations of international regulatory bodies. However, it is important that the operator should be aware of factors affecting the temperature increase.
dc.format.extent? - ? (10)
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
dc.rights.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
dc.subjectUltrasound safety
dc.subjectheating effects
dc.subjectthermal index
dc.subjectDoppler ultrasound
dc.subjectultrasound phantom
dc.subjectTISSUE-MIMICKING MATERIAL
dc.subjectDOPPLER ULTRASOUND
dc.subjectSAFETY
dc.subjectFREQUENCY
dc.subjectTEMPERATURE
dc.subjectATTENUATION
dc.subjectPREGNANCY
dc.titleIn vitro characterisation of ultrasound-induced heating effects in the mother and fetus: A clinical perspective.
dc.typeJournal Article
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1177/1742271X20953197
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-09-14
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfULTRASOUND
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Therapeutic Ultrasound
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Therapeutic Ultrasound
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamTherapeutic Ultrasound
dc.contributor.icrauthorTer Haar, Gail


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record