Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarris, EJ
dc.contributor.authorMukesh, MB
dc.contributor.authorDonovan, EM
dc.contributor.authorKirby, AM
dc.contributor.authorHaviland, JS
dc.contributor.authorJena, R
dc.contributor.authorYarnold, J
dc.contributor.authorBaker, A
dc.contributor.authorDean, J
dc.contributor.authorEagle, S
dc.contributor.authorMayles, H
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, C
dc.contributor.authorPerry, R
dc.contributor.authorPoynter, A
dc.contributor.authorColes, CE
dc.contributor.authorEvans, PM
dc.contributor.authorIMPORT high trialists,
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-01T11:41:48Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.identifier.citationThe British journal of radiology, 2016, 89 (1058), pp. 20150603 - ?
dc.identifier.issn0007-1285
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/423
dc.identifier.eissn1748-880X
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/bjr.20150603
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To determine if subsets of patients may benefit from smaller or larger margins when using laser setup and bony anatomy verification of breast tumour bed (TB) boost radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: Verification imaging data acquired using cone-beam CT, megavoltage CT or two-dimensional kilovoltage imaging on 218 patients were used (1574 images). TB setup errors for laser-only setup (dlaser) and for bony anatomy verification (dbone) were determined using clips implanted into the TB as a gold standard for the TB position. Cases were grouped by centre-, patient- and treatment-related factors, including breast volume, TB position, seroma visibility and surgical technique. Systematic (Σ) and random (σ) TB setup errors were compared between groups, and TB planning target volume margins (MTB) were calculated. RESULTS: For the study population, Σlaser was between 2.8 and 3.4 mm, and Σbone was between 2.2 and 2.6 mm, respectively. Females with larger breasts (p = 0.03), easily visible seroma (p ≤ 0.02) and open surgical technique (p ≤ 0.04) had larger Σlaser. Σbone was larger for females with larger breasts (p = 0.02) and lateral tumours (p = 0.04). Females with medial tumours (p < 0.01) had smaller Σbone. CONCLUSION: If clips are not used, margins should be 8 and 10 mm for bony anatomy verification and laser setup, respectively. Individualization of TB margins may be considered based on breast volume, TB and seroma visibility. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Setup accuracy using lasers and bony anatomy is influenced by patient and treatment factors. Some patients may benefit from clip-based image guidance more than others.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent20150603 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBRITISH INST RADIOLOGY
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectIMPORT high trialists
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectNeoplasm Recurrence, Local
dc.subjectRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
dc.subjectRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
dc.subjectPhotons
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectCone-Beam Computed Tomography
dc.subjectPatient Positioning
dc.subjectAnatomic Landmarks
dc.subjectRadiotherapy, Image-Guided
dc.subjectRadiotherapy Setup Errors
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom
dc.titleA multicentre study of the evidence for customized margins in photon breast boost radiotherapy.
dc.typeJournal Article
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1259/bjr.20150603
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfThe British journal of radiology
pubs.issue1058
pubs.notesNo embargo
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Imaging for Radiotherapy Adaptation
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Imaging for Radiotherapy Adaptation
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume89
pubs.embargo.termsNo embargo
icr.researchteamClinical Trials & Statistics Unit
icr.researchteamBreast Cancer Radiotherapy
icr.researchteamImaging for Radiotherapy Adaptation
dc.contributor.icrauthorHarris, Emma
dc.contributor.icrauthorHaviland, Joanne
dc.contributor.icrauthorYarnold, John
dc.contributor.icrauthorGriffin, Clare


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0