Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPickford Scienti, OLP
dc.contributor.authorBamber, JC
dc.contributor.authorDarambara, DG
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-24T11:59:54Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-27
dc.identifier.citationSensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020, 20 (21)
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4241
dc.identifier.eissn1424-8220
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/s20216093
dc.description.abstractMost modern energy resolving, photon counting detectors employ small (sub 1 mm) pixels for high spatial resolution and low per pixel count rate requirements. These small pixels can suffer from a range of charge sharing effects (CSEs) that degrade both spectral analysis and imaging metrics. A range of charge sharing correction algorithms (CSCAs) have been proposed and validated by different groups to reduce CSEs, however their performance is often compared solely to the same system when no such corrections are made. In this paper, a combination of Monte Carlo and finite element methods are used to compare six different CSCAs with the case where no CSCA is employed, with respect to four different metrics: absolute detection efficiency, photopeak detection efficiency, relative coincidence counts, and binned spectral efficiency. The performance of the various CSCAs is explored when running on systems with pixel pitches ranging from 100 µm to 600µm, in 50 µm increments, and fluxes from 106 to 108 photons mm-2 s-1 are considered. Novel mechanistic explanations for the difference in performance of the various CSCAs are proposed and supported. This work represents a subset of a larger project in which pixel pitch, thickness, flux, and CSCA are all varied systematically.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleCdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-10-24
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3390/s20216093
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-10-27
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfSensors (Basel, Switzerland)
pubs.issue21
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Multimodality Molecular Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Multimodality Molecular Imaging/Multimodality Molecular Imaging (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Ultrasound & Optical Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Multimodality Molecular Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Multimodality Molecular Imaging/Multimodality Molecular Imaging (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Ultrasound & Optical Imaging
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume20
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamMultimodality Molecular Imaging
icr.researchteamUltrasound & Optical Imaging
dc.contributor.icrauthorScienti, Oliver
dc.contributor.icrauthorBamber, Jeffrey


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0