Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHuddart, R
dc.contributor.authorHafeez, S
dc.contributor.authorLewis, R
dc.contributor.authorMcNair, H
dc.contributor.authorSyndikus, I
dc.contributor.authorHenry, A
dc.contributor.authorStaffurth, J
dc.contributor.authorDewan, M
dc.contributor.authorVassallo-Bonner, C
dc.contributor.authorMoinuddin, SA
dc.contributor.authorBirtle, A
dc.contributor.authorHoran, G
dc.contributor.authorRimmer, Y
dc.contributor.authorVenkitaraman, R
dc.contributor.authorKhoo, V
dc.contributor.authorMitra, A
dc.contributor.authorHughes, S
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, S
dc.contributor.authorKapur, G
dc.contributor.authorBaker, A
dc.contributor.authorHansen, VN
dc.contributor.authorPatel, E
dc.contributor.authorHall, E
dc.contributor.authorHYBRID Investigators,
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-17T15:53:29Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-01
dc.identifier.citationInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2020
dc.identifier.issn0360-3016
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4257
dc.identifier.eissn1879-355X
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.068
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Hypofractionated radiation therapy can be used to treat patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer unable to have radical therapy. Toxicity is a key concern, but adaptive plan-of the day (POD) image-guided radiation therapy delivery could improve outcomes by minimizing the volume of normal tissue irradiated. The HYBRID trial assessed the multicenter implementation, safety, and efficacy of this strategy. METHODS: HYBRID is a Phase II randomized trial that was conducted at 14 UK hospitals. Patients with T2-T4aN0M0 muscle-invasive bladder cancer unsuitable for radical therapy received 36 Gy in 6 weekly fractions, randomized (1:1) to standard planning (SP) or adaptive planning (AP) using a minimization algorithm. For AP, a pretreatment cone beam computed tomography (CT) was used to select the POD from 3 plans (small, medium, and large). Follow-up included standard cystoscopic, radiologic, and clinical assessments. The primary endpoint was nongenitourinary Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3 (≥G3) toxicity within 3 months of radiation therapy. A noncomparative single stage design aimed to exclude ≥30% toxicity rate in each planning group in patients who received ≥1 fraction of radiation therapy. Local control at 3-months (both groups combined) was a key secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Between April 15, 2014, and August 10, 2016, 65 patients were enrolled (SP, n = 32; AP, n = 33). The median follow-up time was 38.8 months (interquartile range [IQR], 36.8-51.3). The median age was 85 years (IQR, 81-89); 68% of participants (44 of 65) were male; and 98% of participants had grade 3 urothelial cancer. In 63 evaluable participants, CTCAE ≥G3 nongenitourinary toxicity rates were 6% (2 of 33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7%-20.2%) for the AP group and 13% (4 of 30; 95% CI, 3.8%-30.7%) for the SP group. Disease was present in 9/48 participants assessed at 3 months, giving a local control rate of 81.3% (95% CI, 67.4%-91.1%). CONCLUSIONS: POD adaptive radiation therapy was successfully implemented across multiple centers. Weekly ultrahypofractionated 36 Gy/6 fraction radiation therapy is safe and provides good local control rates in this older patient population.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHYBRID Investigators
dc.titleClinical Outcomes of a Randomized Trial of Adaptive Plan-of-the-Day Treatment in Patients Receiving Ultra-hypofractionated Weekly Radiation Therapy for Bladder Cancer.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-11-25
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.068
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-12-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/ICR-CTSU Urology and Head and Neck Trials Team
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Clinical Academic Radiotherapy (Huddart)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/ICR-CTSU Urology and Head and Neck Trials Team
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Clinical Academic Radiotherapy (Huddart)
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamClinical Trials & Statistics Unit
icr.researchteamICR-CTSU Urology and Head and Neck Trials Team
icr.researchteamClinical Academic Radiotherapy (Huddart)
dc.contributor.icrauthorHuddart, Robert
dc.contributor.icrauthorHafeez, Shaista
dc.contributor.icrauthorLewis, Rebecca
dc.contributor.icrauthorHall, Emma


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0