Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRanger, A
dc.contributor.authorDunlop, A
dc.contributor.authorGrimwood, A
dc.contributor.authorDurie, E
dc.contributor.authorDonovan, E
dc.contributor.authorHavilland, J
dc.contributor.authorHarris, E
dc.contributor.authorMcNair, H
dc.contributor.authorKirby, AM
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-25T14:03:45Z
dc.date.available2021-05-25T14:03:45Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-23
dc.identifier.citationClinical and translational radiation oncology, 2021, 27 pp. 164 - 168
dc.identifier.issn2405-6308
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4588
dc.identifier.eissn2405-6308
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ctro.2021.02.003
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) reduces radiation dose to the heart in patients undergoing locoregional breast radiotherapy. In the context of tangential irradiation of the breast/ chest wall, a voluntary breath hold (vDIBH) technique has been shown to be as reproducible as a machine-assisted breath hold technique using the active breathing co-ordinator (ABC™, Elekta, Crawley, UK, ABC_DIBH). This study compares set-up reproducibility for vDIBH versus ABC_DIBH in patients undergoing volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) for breast cancer, both with and without wax bolus. METHOD: Patients with breast cancer requiring pan regional lymph node VMAT +/- wax bolus in breath-hold were CT scanned in vDIBH and ABC_DIBH. Patients were randomised to receive one technique for fractions 1-7 and the other for fractions 8-15. Daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed and registered to planning-CT using bony anatomy. Within-patient comparisons of mean daily chest wall position were made using a paired t-test. Population, systematic (∑) and random errors (α) were estimated. Intrafraction reproducibility was assessed by comparing chest wall position and diaphragm movement between consecutive breath holds on CBCT. RESULTS: 16 patients were recruited. All completed treatment with both techniques (9 patients with wax bolus, 7 patients without). CBCT derived ∑ were 2.1-6.4 mm (ABC_DIBH) and 2.1-4.9 mm (vDIBH), α were 1.7-2.6 mm (ABC_DIBH) and 2.2-2.7 mm (vDIBH) and mean daily chest wall displacements (MD) were 0.0-1.5 mm (ABC_DIBH) and -0.1-1.6 vDIBH (all p non-significant). Chest wall and diaphragm position was equivalent between consecutive breath holds in ABC and vDIBH (median difference 1.0 mm and 0.8 mm respectively, non p significant) demonstrating equivalent intrafraction reproducibility. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a simple voluntary breath hold technique is feasible in combination with VMAT (+/- bolus) and is as reproducible as ABC_DIBH with VMAT for the irradiation of the breast and axillary and IMC lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.
dc.formatElectronic-eCollection
dc.format.extent164 - 168
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.titleVoluntary versus ABC breath-hold in the context of VMAT for breast and locoregional lymph node radiotherapy including the internal mammary chain.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-02-07
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.ctro.2021.02.003
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfClinical and translational radiation oncology
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume27
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamBreast Cancer Radiotherapy
icr.researchteamBreast Cancer Radiotherapy
dc.contributor.icrauthorDurie, Emily


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0