Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDefachelles, A-S
dc.contributor.authorBogart, E
dc.contributor.authorCasanova, M
dc.contributor.authorMerks, JHM
dc.contributor.authorBisogno, G
dc.contributor.authorCalareso, G
dc.contributor.authorGallego Melcon, S
dc.contributor.authorGatz, SA
dc.contributor.authorLe Deley, M-C
dc.contributor.authorMcHugh, K
dc.contributor.authorProbst, A
dc.contributor.authorRocourt, N
dc.contributor.authorvan Rijn, RR
dc.contributor.authorWheatley, K
dc.contributor.authorMinard-Colin, V
dc.contributor.authorChisholm, JC
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-08T12:18:46Z
dc.date.available2021-11-08T12:18:46Z
dc.identifier.citationJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2021, 39 (27), pp. 2979 - 2990
dc.identifier.issn0732-183X
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4877
dc.identifier.eissn1527-7755
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/jco.21.00124
dc.description.abstractPurpose The VIT-0910 trial was conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of the vincristine-irinotecan combination with and without temozolomide (VIT and VI, respectively) in relapsed or refractory rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). Methods In this randomized European phase II trial, patients age 0.5-50 years received 21-day cycles combining vincristine (1.5 mg/m 2 once a day on day 1 and day 8) and irinotecan (50 mg/m 2 once a day from day 1 to day 5) with and without temozolomide (125 mg/m 2 once a day from day 1 to day 5 and 150 mg/m 2 once a day from cycle 2), until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate after two cycles. Secondary end points included best response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. A Simon 2-stage design was initially planned to separately analyze 40 patients/arm. After amendment, the trial sample size was increased to 120 and a comparison between arms, adjusted for confounding factors, was added to the statistical plan (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01355445). Results Overall, 120 patients (60 per arm) were recruited in 37 European centers. The median age was 11 years (range, 0.75-45); 89% of patients had a relapsed RMS. The objective response rate was 44% (24 of 55 evaluable patients) for VIT versus 31% (18 of 58) for VI (adjusted odds ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.22 to 1.12; P = .09). The VIT arm achieved significantly better overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.84; P = .006) compared with VI, with consistent progression-free survival results (adj-hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.01; P = .059). Overall, patients experienced adverse events ≥ grade 3 more frequently with VIT than VI (98% v 78%, respectively; P = .009), including a significant excess of hematologic toxicity (81% v 61%; P = .025). Conclusion The addition of temozolomide to VI improved chemotherapy efficacy for patients with relapsed RMS, with manageable increase in toxicity. VIT is considered the new standard treatment in these patients in the European paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Group and will be the control arm in the next randomized trial.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent2979 - 2990
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
dc.titleRandomized Phase II Trial of Vincristine-Irinotecan With or Without Temozolomide, in Children and Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Rhabdomyosarcoma: A European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group and Innovative Therapies for Children With Cancer Trial.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-08-03
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1200/jco.21.00124
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
pubs.issue27
pubs.notesNo embargo
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Sarcoma Clinical Trials in Children and Young People
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Sarcoma Clinical Trials in Children and Young People/Sarcoma Clinical Trials in Children and Young People (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Molecular Pathology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Molecular Pathology/Sarcoma Clinical Trials in children and young people
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Molecular Pathology/Sarcoma Clinical Trials in children and young people/Sarcoma Clinical Trials in Children and Young People (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume39
pubs.embargo.termsNo embargo
icr.researchteamSarcoma Clinical Trials in children and young people
dc.contributor.icrauthorChisholm, Juliaen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record