Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWetscherek, A
dc.contributor.authorvan der Bijl, E
dc.contributor.authorvan Lier, ALH
dc.contributor.authorChick, J
dc.contributor.authorJackson, S
dc.contributor.authorGibson, S
dc.contributor.authorvan Pelt, V
dc.contributor.authorHasler, SW
dc.contributor.authorTijssen, RHN
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-06T12:52:34Z
dc.date.available2022-09-06T12:52:34Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-13
dc.identifierARTN 891600
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Physics, 2022, 10en_US
dc.identifier.issn2296-424X
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/5423
dc.identifier.eissn2296-424X
dc.identifier.eissn2296-424X
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphy.2022.891600
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>MR-guided radiotherapy on hybrid MR-Linacs exploits the excellent soft-tissue contrast of MRI to deliver daily adaptive precision radiotherapy. Geometric fidelity and long-term stability of MRI components are essential, but their longitudinal performance under daily exposure to scattered ionizing radiation is unknown. We report on longitudinal stability of periodic MRI QA on eight clinical 1.5T MR-Linac systems. We provided measurement instructions for periodic MRI QA and received data from seven different centers within the Elekta MR-Linac consortium, which contributed data over acquisition periods ranging from 3–24 months. We tested B<jats:sub>0</jats:sub> and B<jats:sub>1</jats:sub> homogeneity using a 37 cm diameter cylindrical phantom, which was measured monthly in axial orientation, supplemented by quarterly sagittal and coronal acquisitions. We report average, standard deviation and peak-to-peak variation (99th-1st percentile) within a region of interest (ROI) of 35 cm diameter. Dependence of B<jats:sub>0</jats:sub> on the gantry angle and gradient non-linearity were tested quarterly. We analyzed the longitudinal stability of selected metrics of the vendor-provided periodic image quality tests. We found high temporal stability of B<jats:sub>0</jats:sub> and B<jats:sub>1</jats:sub> measurements and good agreement between different MR-Linac systems. For all measurements, the standard deviation of B<jats:sub>0</jats:sub> within the analyzed ROI was below 0.66/0.33/0.33 ppm for axial/sagittal/coronal orientation. The average standard deviation of the ratio between actual and nominal flip angle was 0.022/0.100/0.088 for axial/sagittal/coronal orientation. Systems exhibited distinctively different gantry angle dependencies of B<jats:sub>0</jats:sub>, with sensitivities of B<jats:sub>0</jats:sub> to the gantry angle differing by factors of up to two between systems. Gradient non-linearity analysis yielded average radii of 172 and 242 mm for which 98% of the phantom markers had deviations below 1 and 2 mm, respectively. All analyzed periodic image quality tests were passed, but major events including a body coil replacement and ramp down were apparent in the time series. Overall we found very similar performance of the tested systems and our results could inform the implementation of MR imaging QA for MR-Linacs. While we found differences of the gantry angle dependence of B<jats:sub>0</jats:sub> between systems, the high temporal stability found for all tests is a foundation for stereotactic radiotherapy and multi-center clinical trials involving quantitative MRI.</jats:p>
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFRONTIERS MEDIA SAen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Physics
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectPhysical Sciences
dc.subjectPhysics, Multidisciplinary
dc.subjectPhysics
dc.subjectMR-linac
dc.subjectlongitudinal QA
dc.subjectgantry dependence
dc.subjectstability analysis
dc.subjectMR-guided radiotherapy
dc.subjectMRI QA
dc.subjectGRADIENT SYSTEM CHARACTERIZATION
dc.subjectQUANTITATIVE IMAGING BIOMARKERS
dc.subjectQUALITY
dc.subjectRADIOTHERAPY
dc.subjectRADIATION
dc.subjectDISTORTION
dc.subjectMULTICENTER
dc.titleLongitudinal Stability of MRI QA up to Two Years on Eight Clinical 1.5 T MR-Linacsen_US
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-05-17
dc.date.updated2022-09-06T12:52:05Z
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3389/fphy.2022.891600en_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-06-13
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000817802100001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=d4b848928d1c3e5c86d298abb68475f9
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radiotherapy
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.891600
pubs.volume10
icr.researchteamMagnet Resonance Imagingen_US
dc.contributor.icrauthorWetscherek, Andreas
icr.provenanceDeposited by Mr Arek Surman on 2022-09-06. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: fphy-10-891600.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/