Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authordeSouza, NM
dc.contributor.authorvan der Lugt, A
dc.contributor.authorDeroose, CM
dc.contributor.authorAlberich-Bayarri, A
dc.contributor.authorBidaut, L
dc.contributor.authorFournier, L
dc.contributor.authorCostaridou, L
dc.contributor.authorOprea-Lager, DE
dc.contributor.authorKotter, E
dc.contributor.authorSmits, M
dc.contributor.authorMayerhoefer, ME
dc.contributor.authorBoellaard, R
dc.contributor.authorCaroli, A
dc.contributor.authorde Geus-Oei, L-F
dc.contributor.authorKunz, WG
dc.contributor.authorOei, EH
dc.contributor.authorLecouvet, F
dc.contributor.authorFranca, M
dc.contributor.authorLoewe, C
dc.contributor.authorLopci, E
dc.contributor.authorCaramella, C
dc.contributor.authorPersson, A
dc.contributor.authorGolay, X
dc.contributor.authorDewey, M
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, JPB
dc.contributor.authordeGraaf, P
dc.contributor.authorGatidis, S
dc.contributor.authorZahlmann, G
dc.contributor.authorEuropean Society of Radiology,
dc.contributor.authorEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer,
dc.coverage.spatialGermany
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-22T12:53:20Z
dc.date.available2022-12-22T12:53:20Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-04
dc.identifierARTN 159
dc.identifier10.1186/s13244-022-01287-4
dc.identifier.citationInsights into Imaging, 2022, 13 (1), pp. 159 -
dc.identifier.issn1869-4101
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/5618
dc.identifier.eissn1869-4101
dc.identifier.eissn1869-4101
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13244-022-01287-4
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Lesion/tissue segmentation on digital medical images enables biomarker extraction, image-guided therapy delivery, treatment response measurement, and training/validation for developing artificial intelligence algorithms and workflows. To ensure data reproducibility, criteria for standardised segmentation are critical but currently unavailable. METHODS: A modified Delphi process initiated by the European Imaging Biomarker Alliance (EIBALL) of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Imaging Group was undertaken. Three multidisciplinary task forces addressed modality and image acquisition, segmentation methodology itself, and standards and logistics. Devised survey questions were fed via a facilitator to expert participants. The 58 respondents to Round 1 were invited to participate in Rounds 2-4. Subsequent rounds were informed by responses of previous rounds. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Items with ≥ 75% consensus are considered a recommendation. These include system performance certification, thresholds for image signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise and tumour-to-background ratios, spatial resolution, and artefact levels. Direct, iterative, and machine or deep learning reconstruction methods, use of a mixture of CE marked and verified research tools were agreed and use of specified reference standards and validation processes considered essential. Operator training and refreshment were considered mandatory for clinical trials and clinical research. Items with a 60-74% agreement require reporting (site-specific accreditation for clinical research, minimal pixel number within lesion segmented, use of post-reconstruction algorithms, operator training refreshment for clinical practice). Items with ≤ 60% agreement are outside current recommendations for segmentation (frequency of system performance tests, use of only CE-marked tools, board certification of operators, frequency of operator refresher training). Recommendations by anatomical area are also specified.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extent159 -
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.relation.ispartofInsights into Imaging
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectModality-specific
dc.subjectOrgan-specific
dc.subjectRegion of interest
dc.subjectSegmentation and standardisation
dc.subjectmDelphi
dc.titleStandardised lesion segmentation for imaging biomarker quantitation: a consensus recommendation from ESR and EORTC.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-08-01
dc.date.updated2022-12-22T12:52:26Z
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s13244-022-01287-4
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-10-04
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36194301
pubs.issue1
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance
pubs.publication-statusPublished online
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01287-4
pubs.volume13
icr.researchteamMagnetic Resonance
dc.contributor.icrauthordeSouza, Nandita
dc.contributor.icrauthorO'Connor, James Patrick
icr.provenanceDeposited by Mr Arek Surman on 2022-12-22. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: Standardised lesion segmentation for imaging biomarker quantitation a consensus recommendation from ESR and EORTC.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/