Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWebb, K
dc.contributor.authorGothard, L
dc.contributor.authorMohammed, K
dc.contributor.authorKirby, AM
dc.contributor.authorLocke, I
dc.contributor.authorSomaiah, N
dc.coverage.spatialEngland
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-05T11:04:13Z
dc.date.available2023-09-05T11:04:13Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-01
dc.identifierS0936-6555(23)00219-4
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oncology, 2023, 35 (9), pp. e469 - e477
dc.identifier.issn0936-6555
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/5953
dc.identifier.eissn1433-2981
dc.identifier.eissn1433-2981
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clon.2023.06.006
dc.description.abstractAIMS: For patients with locally advanced primary/recurrent breast cancer, radiotherapy is an effective treatment for locoregional control. 36 Gy in 6 Gy once-weekly fractions is a commonly used schedule, but there are no data comparing local control and toxicity between 36 Gy delivered once-weekly versus accelerated schedules of multiple 6 Gy fractions per week. This retrospective study compared local control rates and acute and late toxicity in patients undergoing 30-36 Gy in 6 Gy fractions over 6 weeks versus more accelerated schedules over 2-3 weeks for an unresected breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received 30-36 Gy in 6 Gy fractions to an unresected breast cancer ± involved lymph nodes between December 2011 and August 2020 were identified. Patients were grouped into once-weekly versus accelerated fractionation schedules. Response rates, local control and toxicity data were analysed. RESULTS: In total, 109 patients were identified. The median follow-up duration was 46 months. Forty-seven patients (43%) received once-weekly fractions and 62 patients (57%) received accelerated fractionation schedules. There were no significant differences in baseline tumour characteristics between the groups. Eighty-seven per cent of patients had an objective (complete or partial) response (81% in the once-weekly group; 91% in the accelerated group). The median time to local progression was 23.5 months overall (95% confidence interval 17.8-29.2); 23.5 months (95% confidence interval 18.8-28.1) in the once-weekly group and 19.0 months (95% confidence interval 7.0-31.1) in the accelerated group (P = 0.99). Acute toxicity of any grade occurred in 75% of patients (76% in the once-weekly group; 74% in the accelerated group) and grade 3 toxicity occurred in 7% of patients (7% in the once-weekly group; 8% in the accelerated group). There were no associations between the groups and acute or late toxicity grade (P = 0.78 and P = 0.26, respectively), although one grade 4 late toxicity (skin radionecrosis) occurred in a patient who received five fractions a week and therefore this regimen is not recommended. Study limitations included a lack of statistical power analysis, the necessary grouping of all accelerated patients for analysis and a high rate of censored data. CONCLUSION: There were no apparent differences in response rate, time to local progression or toxicity between patients who received 30-36 Gy in 6 Gy fractions once-weekly compared with twice-weekly as palliative treatment for locally advanced breast cancer. This regimen appears to be a safe alternative and may be preferred by patients.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extente469 - e477
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oncology
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectBreast cancer
dc.subjectHypofractionation
dc.subjectPalliative radiotherapy
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectPalliative Care
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectDose Fractionation, Radiation
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.titleLocoregional control and toxicity following high-dose hypofractionated and accelerated palliative radiotherapy regimens in breast cancer.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-06-06
dc.date.updated2023-09-05T09:02:54Z
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.clon.2023.06.006
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-09-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37422360
pubs.issue9
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy/Breast Cancer Radiotherapy (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Translational Breast Radiobiology
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2023.06.006
pubs.volume35
icr.researchteamTrans Breast Radiobiol
dc.contributor.icrauthorGothard, Lone
dc.contributor.icrauthorSomaiah, Navita
icr.provenanceDeposited by Sanda Ghiurcusor (impersonating Dr Navita Somaiah) on 2023-09-05. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: Webb ESTRO abstract final.docx
icr.provenanceDeposited by Mr Arek Surman (impersonating Dr Navita Somaiah) on 2023-09-05. Deposit type is subsequent. No. of files: 1. Files: 1-s2.0-S0936655523002194-main.pdf
icr.provenanceDeposited by Sanda Ghiurcusor (impersonating Dr Navita Somaiah) on 2023-09-05. Deposit type is subsequent. No. of files: 1. Files: Webb Estro Article.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/