Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBisgaard, ALH
dc.contributor.authorKeesman, R
dc.contributor.authorvan Lier, ALHMW
dc.contributor.authorCoolens, C
dc.contributor.authorvan Houdt, PJ
dc.contributor.authorTree, A
dc.contributor.authorWetscherek, A
dc.contributor.authorRomesser, PB
dc.contributor.authorTyagi, N
dc.contributor.authorLo Russo, M
dc.contributor.authorHabrich, J
dc.contributor.authorVesprini, D
dc.contributor.authorLau, AZ
dc.contributor.authorMook, S
dc.contributor.authorChung, P
dc.contributor.authorKerkmeijer, LGW
dc.contributor.authorGouw, ZAR
dc.contributor.authorLorenzen, EL
dc.contributor.authorvan der Heide, UA
dc.contributor.authorSchytte, T
dc.contributor.authorBrink, C
dc.contributor.authorMahmood, F
dc.coverage.spatialIreland
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-29T11:54:32Z
dc.date.available2023-09-29T11:54:32Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-01
dc.identifier109803
dc.identifierS0167-8140(23)00341-9
dc.identifier.citationRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2023, 186 pp. 109803 -
dc.identifier.issn0167-8140
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/6000
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0887
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0887
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109803
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), a potential imaging biomarker for radiotherapy response, needs to be reproducible before translation into clinical use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the multi-centre delineation- and calculation-related ADC variation and give recommendations to minimize it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine centres received identical diffusion-weighted and anatomical magnetic resonance images of different cancerous tumours (adrenal gland, pelvic oligo metastasis, pancreas, and prostate). All centres delineated the gross tumour volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), and viable tumour volume (VTV), and calculated ADCs using both their local calculation methods and each of the following calculation conditions: b-values 0-500 vs. 150-500 s/mm2, region-of-interest (ROI)-based vs. voxel-based calculation, and mean vs. median. ADC variation was assessed using the mean coefficient of variation across delineations (CVD) and calculation methods (CVC). Absolute ADC differences between calculation conditions were evaluated using Friedman's test. Recommendations for ADC calculation were formulated based on observations and discussions within the Elekta MRI-linac consortium image analysis working group. RESULTS: The median (range) CVD and CVC were 0.06 (0.02-0.32) and 0.17 (0.08-0.26), respectively. The ADC estimates differed 18% between b-value sets and 4% between ROI/voxel-based calculation (p-values < 0.01). No significant difference was observed between mean and median (p = 0.64). Aligning calculation conditions between centres reduced CVC to 0.04 (0.01-0.16). CVD was comparable between ROI types. CONCLUSION: Overall, calculation methods had a larger impact on ADC reproducibility compared to delineation. Based on the results, significant sources of variation were identified, which should be considered when initiating new studies, in particular multi-centre investigations.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent109803 -
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
dc.relation.ispartofRadiotherapy and Oncology
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectADC reproducibility
dc.subjectAdaptive radiotheray
dc.subjectApparent diffusion coefficient
dc.subjectDiffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectMRI biomarkers
dc.subjectMRI-Linac
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectDiffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectNeoplasms
dc.subjectImage Processing, Computer-Assisted
dc.titleRecommendations for improved reproducibility of ADC derivation on behalf of the Elekta MRI-linac consortium image analysis working group.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-07-06
dc.date.updated2023-09-29T11:53:59Z
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109803
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-09-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37437609
pubs.organisational-groupICR
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radiotherapy
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109803
pubs.volume186
icr.researchteamMagnet Resonance Imaging
dc.contributor.icrauthorWetscherek, Andreas
icr.provenanceDeposited by Mr Arek Surman on 2023-09-29. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: 1-s2.0-S0167814023003419-main.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/