Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSternberg, C
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, A
dc.contributor.authorPili, R
dc.contributor.authorNg, S
dc.contributor.authorHuddart, R
dc.contributor.authorAgarwal, N
dc.contributor.authorKhvorostenko, D
dc.contributor.authorLyulko, O
dc.contributor.authorBrize, A
dc.contributor.authorVogelzang, N
dc.contributor.authorDelva, R
dc.contributor.authorHarza, M
dc.contributor.authorThanos, A
dc.contributor.authorJames, N
dc.contributor.authorWerbrouck, P
dc.contributor.authorBögemann, M
dc.contributor.authorHutson, T
dc.contributor.authorMilecki, P
dc.contributor.authorChowdhury, S
dc.contributor.authorGallardo, E
dc.contributor.authorSchwartsmann, G
dc.contributor.authorPouget, J-C
dc.contributor.authorBaton, F
dc.contributor.authorNederman, T
dc.contributor.authorTuvesson, H
dc.contributor.authorCarducci, M
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-21T16:33:49Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-01
dc.identifier.citationJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016, 34 (22), pp. 2636 - 2643
dc.identifier.issn0732-183X
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/613
dc.identifier.eissn1527-7755
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/jco.2016.66.9697
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Tasquinimod, a novel oral therapy targeting the tumor microenvironment, significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in a randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This phase III study was conducted to confirm the phase II results and to detect an overall survival (OS) benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC and evidence of bone metastases were assigned (2:1) to receive tasquinimod once per day or placebo until progression or toxicity. The primary end point was radiographic PFS (rPFS; time from random assignment to radiologic progression or death) per Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria and RECIST 1.1. The study had 99.9% power to detect an rPFS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.6 with a two-sided alpha error of .05 and 80% power to detect a target HR of 0.8 for OS, the key secondary end point. RESULTS: In all, 1,245 patients were randomly assigned to either tasquinimod (n = 832) or placebo (n = 413) between March 2011 and December 2012 at 241 sites in 37 countries. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups: median age, 71 years; Karnofsky performance status ≥ 90%, 77.3%; and visceral metastases, 21.1%. Estimated median rPFS by central review was 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 8.2 months) with tasquinimod and 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 5.5 months) with placebo (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.75; P < .001). Median OS was 21.3 months (95% CI, 19.5 to 23.0 months) with tasquinimod and 24.0 months (95% CI, 21.4 to 26.9 months) with placebo (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.28; P = .25). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were more frequent with tasquinimod (42.8% v 33.6%), the most common being anemia, fatigue, and cancer pain. CONCLUSION: In chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC, tasquinimod significantly improved rPFS compared with placebo. However, no OS benefit was observed.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent2636 - 2643
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
dc.rights.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectNeoplasm Metastasis
dc.subjectQuinolones
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Agents
dc.subjectDouble-Blind Method
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
dc.titleRandomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of Tasquinimod in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-06-13
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1200/jco.2016.66.9697
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-08
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
pubs.issue22
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Clinical Academic Radiotherapy (Huddart)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Prostate and Bladder Cancer Research
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Clinical Academic Radiotherapy (Huddart)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Prostate and Bladder Cancer Research
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume34
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamClinical Academic Radiotherapy (Huddart)
icr.researchteamProstate and Bladder Cancer Research
dc.contributor.icrauthorHuddart, Robert
dc.contributor.icrauthorJames, Nicholas


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record